Description
Dear listeners,
The CD you hold in your hands does not aim merely to present a self‑contained programme of works, as is customary for recordings of this kind. Rather, its intention is to revive — and in some instances to bring into being — a small selection of pieces of genuine artistic value that, for various reasons, have been neglected or have never before been performed.
Some time ago a viola‑playing friend in St. Petersburg sent me a large parcel of viola scores published in Russia between the 1950s and the 1980s. Much of this repertoire comprised arrangements for the instrument by Vadim Borisovsky — whom I regard as a true master of the modern Russian school of viola playing — and by several of his virtuoso colleagues. On working through these scores, I was so taken by many of the pieces that I resolved to add them to my performing repertoire and to record them at the first opportunity. Regrettably, the playback time of this recording project has not allowed all of them to be included on the present disc.
This recording is also intended as a personal tribute to the great exponents of my instrument, such as William Primrose and Lionel Tertis, whose extraordinary artistry has enriched the viola repertoire, both through substantial original works and through smaller pieces and transcriptions. If this disc can provide inspiration to today’s younger generation of violists, including those still in training, it will have fulfilled its purpose.
I am particularly pleased to have been able to include two distinctive and highly original works for viola and piano by Adam Skoumal, who is not only a fine composer and pianist but also, above all, a valued colleague. It is my sincere hope that these pieces will find a lasting place also in the repertoire of other viola players.
Vladimír Bukač, 2026
In the history of the viola, virtuosity long bore the character of a conquest. For centuries the instrument inhabited the heart of the texture, the middle region of discourse, the discreet nobility of the inner register; only between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, thanks to a lineage of performers, transcribers and composers, did it acquire a fully fledged solo prominence. The programme of this disc, significantly entitled Viola Fascination, follows a logic at once deeper and more historically revealing than that offered by the merely monographic recital. It is a project born of the desire to bring back to light pages of genuine artistic worth, often left on the margins or never truly admitted into the repertory, many of them drawn from Russian viola editions published between the 1950s and the 1980s. To this is added a homage to the great genealogy of modern viola-playing, first and foremost William Primrose and Lionel Tertis, alongside the central figure of Vadim Borisovskij. The track listing itself demonstrates this with limpid clarity, since it gathers transcriptions by Borisovskij and his colleagues beside two contemporary pages by Adam Skoumal, as though the fascination evoked by the title were to take shape at once as memory, rediscovery and renewed projection.
If Lionel Tertis was in England the great pioneer who demonstrated how the viola might honourably sustain even the upper register and the transcribed repertory, Primrose rendered that emancipation more spectacular still, going so far, in his customary vein, as to declare his wish to rescue the viola from its reputation as a subdued instrument. In Russia the decisive name was that of Vadim Borisovskij. An important study devoted to the Russian viola school observes that he essentially created the Soviet school of the viola as solo instrument, chamber instrument and pedagogical discipline, enlarging its repertory through transcriptions and new works dedicated to him. The same essay further recalls his role in the Beethoven Quartet, the ensemble that would introduce almost all of Šostakovič’s quartets, and his pedagogical activity, from which there emerged such figures as Fëdor Družinin and Jurij Bašmet. To these elements must be added a fact of decisive importance for understanding the horizon of the disc: Borisovskij contributed more than two hundred arrangements and transcriptions to the repertory of the viola and of the viola d’amore. In this light, the variety of the programme acquires a precise historical coherence. It reflects a culture of the instrument in which transcription constitutes a high form of violistic imagination.
Paganini’s La Campanella, refracted through the ingenuity of Primrose, stands at the outset as a manifesto. Nothing more clearly proclaims the will of the twentieth-century viola to appropriate violinistic vertigo and refashion it within a darker, more carnal sonic body, yet one no less agile. The tintinnabulation evoked by the title, the lightness of the leaps, the taste for caprice, all are brought back to a writing that lives by challenge and scintillation. Immediately thereafter, the Schumann of Adagio e Allegro op. 70 introduces another visage of virtuosity. The work was born for horn and piano, with alternative parts for violin and cello supplied by the composer himself, and precisely this origin explains the quality of its song, broad, breathing, sustained by a nobility of phrasing almost heraldic in instrumental bearing. In its passage to the viola, accomplished by Borisovskij, the work acquires a more intimate urgency. The Adagio speaks with gathered intensity; the Allegro preserves the impetuous gesture, yet interiorises it. To place Paganini beside Schumann is thus to establish from the outset the double status of the instrument, acrobat and confessor, theatre and monologue.
The heart of the programme, however, belongs to the Russian horizon, which Borisovskij knew how to transform into a true homeland of the viola. Čajkovskij enters it with the Notturno op. 19 no. 4, a page born within the 6 Pezzi for piano and later reworked by the composer himself for cello and small orchestra for Anatolij Brandukov. In it the melodic line seems to seek a space of confession that the viola, with its shadowed timbre, receives with an almost predestined naturalness. Glazunov appears twice: on the one hand with the Élégie op. 44, which belongs originally to the viola repertory and constitutes almost a seal of historical legitimisation within the disc; on the other with another meditative page entrusted to the arrangement of Vadim Skibin, sign that the tradition of transcribing for the viola continued in the wake of the Borisovskian lesson. To this line are joined the Melodia op. 3 no. 3 of Rachmaninov, drawn from the Morceaux de fantaisie, and the Farewell of Glinka, that is to say the nocturne La séparation, which Borisovskij felt to be so akin to his own ideal of cantabile that he returned more than once to the name of Glinka elsewhere as well, even to the point of completing his unfinished viola sonata. Here virtuosity is identified with mastery of the sustained tone, of portamento, of lyrical memory, of restrained intensity.
Alongside this elegiac vein, the disc reveals another truth of the Russian viola, its theatrical and dancing vocation. Borisovskij understood that the instrument possessed a natural aptitude for the mask, for caricature, for the sudden gesture, for the nervous energy of the stage. In this sense the Gopak of Musorgskij from the unfinished fair of Sorocińcy and the Spring Dance of Šostakovič bring into the recital the element of popular festivity, of the launched step, of rhythmic contour cut with decision. More significant still is the presence of Prokof’ev. The catalogue of the composer’s works records, among the many rewritings derived from Romeo e Giulietta, a series of versions for viola and piano due precisely to Borisovskij, including among others The Girl Juliet and Mercutio, that is to say exactly the two dramatic poles chosen here by the programme, the mobile and still almost incorporeal girlhood of Juliet and the darting, ironic, mercurial intelligence of Mercutio. Recent discography and violistic scholarship alike have continued to point to the Borisovskian version of Romeo e Giulietta as a reference point. In these transcriptions the viola ceases to be merely an inward voice and becomes a stage actor, capable of changing countenance within the space of a few bars, of passing from lyricism to sarcasm, from dance to tragic shadow.
That two pages by Adam Skoumal should be added to this path means showing that the history of violistic fascination has not run its course. In the notes devoted to his own works, Skoumal clarifies with rare precision the matrices of his imagination. Shalik, a piece of overtly virtuosic character, takes its title from an Arabic word meaning scarf and alludes to a Lebanese song heard by the composer’s wife during a journey in the Middle East; born for violin and piano, the page was later adapted for cello and for viola, and also acquired an orchestral guise. The Variations on Gypsy Melodies, by contrast, proceed from a theme encountered in the celebrated Russian film of the 1970s Gypsies Go to Heaven and openly declare the dual magnetism exercised upon Skoumal by Gypsy music and by Middle Eastern music. Here too the compositional trajectory is significant, from the duo with piano to the string and wind orchestra, all the way to the various solo versions; the score, chosen twice as the compulsory work in international violin competitions, has become the composer’s most frequently performed composition. To place these pages within an anthology dominated by transcription is to affirm that the contemporary viola may still be born of encounter, migration and metamorphosis.
The unity of the disc thus reveals itself precisely where, at first glance, it might appear to be lacking. Viola Fascination is the portrait of an instrument that has built its modernity thanks to an art of the threshold. It has assimilated the great Romantic melody, operatic recollection, ballet, the bravura piece, the salon miniature, idealised folklore, and has translated all this into a specific language marked by a mezzo-soprano tint, by a shadowed nobility, by an unceasing tension between inwardness and exteriority. The selection of pieces constitutes a small nucleus of genuine artistic value to be restored to circulation, together with a tribute to the great masters who have enriched the viola repertory both with original works and with transcriptions. Such a declaration is to be taken literally. The programme delineates part of the conquest of the viola, from transcription as an act of necessity to transcription as an act of sovereign freedom. In that passage the instrument finds its own voice, and that voice, now brilliant, now elegiac, now Gypsy-like, now theatrical, fully justifies the title of the disc.
Giulaino Marco Mattioli © 2026
Artist(s)
Adam Skoumal (*1969) is acclaimed in Europe, the USA and Japan as a leading Czech pianist and composer. He has appeared as soloist with most Czech orchestras (under conductors such as Petr Altrichter, Serge Baud, Lukasz Borowicz, Jiří Kout, Jakub Hrůša, Leoš Svárovský, Stanislav Vavřínek, Petr Vronský and Andreas‑Sebastian Weiser), with the Slovak Philharmonic, the Bamberg Symphony (conducted by Jonathan Nott) and numerous other European ensembles. In recent years he has performed with the Czech Philharmonic cycle, the FOK Symphony Orchestra, the Prague Chamber Philharmonic, the Pilsen Philharmonic and the Karlovy Vary Symphony Orchestra, and appeared at festivals including the Prague Spring, Moravian Autumn, Janáček May, Concentus Moraviae and Lípa Musica. He has also toured internationally with the National Theatre Orchestra.
Skoumal first attracted attention as a composer at the Prague Spring competition in 1998, where he won the prize for the best performance of a contemporary Czech work. His 1st Piano Concerto premiered in 2006 with the Prague Chamber Philharmonic; his 2nd Piano Concerto was premiered the same year with the South Bohemian Chamber Philharmonic. In summer 2008 his piece Djinnia for violin and piano was premiered at the Dubrovnik Festival by Shlomo Mintz, who later included it on his South American tour and in recitals in Rome and Milan; Czech audiences heard it at Prague Spring 2009, and its orchestral version (soloist Jiří Vodička) was conducted live on Czech Television by Jiří Bělohlávek in 2013. Skoumal’s Variations on a Gypsy Melody was chosen as a compulsory contemporary piece for the 2009 Concours International de Violon in Sion and the 2010 Buenos Aires International Violin Competition. In 2014 the Prague Spring Festival commissioned a violin concerto from him, premiered by Roman Patočka with the Czech Radio Symphony Orchestra under Peter Altrichter.
He studied at the Prague Conservatory with Eva Boguniová and at the Academy of Performing Arts with Jan Panenka and Peter Toperczer, later continuing his training in the United States on scholarships to Southern Methodist University (Dallas) and the Manhattan School of Music (New York) with Ruth Laredo. He also attended masterclasses with Lazar Berman, András Schiff, Philippe Entremont, Eugene Indjic and Marián Lapšanský.
Skoumal is a prize‑winner of numerous competitions: 1st prize at the Czech Conservatory Competition, laureate (2nd prize) at the 1998 Prague Spring International Competition, and awards in international contests in Italy (Pinerolo 1999), Portugal (Porto 1999) and the USA (Leschetizky Competition, New York).
His discography includes recordings of Schumann, Dvořák, Smetana, Rejcha and Janáček; further recordings are held by Czech Radio, Czech Television and WQXR (New York). The label ArcoDiva released his latest CD featuring concertos by Rachmaninoff and J. S. Bach with the Prague Symphony Orchestra FOK.
Vladimír Bukač (*1964) is among the leading violists in the Czech Republic. Born in Prague, Vladimír Bukač began first violin studies at an early age and continued with Nora Grumlíková at the Prague Conservatory and the Academy of Performing Arts, followed by studies with Wolfgang Marschner at the University of Music Freiburg. During his studies he won several national and international competitions.
From 1990 to 1993 he was engaged in Japan as a solo violist and chamber musician at the Orchestra Ensemble Kanazawa, performing in the country’s foremost venues and touring Australia and New Zealand. After returning to Europe, he joined the renowned Talich Quartet (1993–2017), long regarded as one of the world’s finest string quartets. With the Talich Quartet he toured entire Europe, Japan, the Americas and South Korea, made numerous internationally award‑winning recordings and gave masterclasses at prestigious music institutions worldwide.
Since leaving the quartet in 2017, he has concentrated on solo and chamber music performance and on teaching activities. Vladimír Bukač is a highly sought‑after professor of viola and chamber music: since 2002 at the Hochschule für Musik Dresden and since 2017as well as at the Royal Conservatory of Brussels. He is regularly invited to serve on juries of major international competitions (e.g. L. Tertis, ARD Munich and others).
He is artistic director of the masterclasses of the Music Academy Telč in Czech Republic (www.akademietelc.cz) and is frequently invited to festivals across Europe (Helsinki, Sardinia, Prades, International Holland Music Session and others.), as well as in Japan, Israel and the USA, collaborating with distinguished artists. A concert he gave in the BBC’s “International Recitals” series from Bristol was broadcast live to some 60 countries had a hugely positive response in the music world.
His extensive viola repertoire spans many styles; numerous works have been recorded for Czech Radio and the BBC. Notable recordings include complete suites by Max Reger and a recording of concertos by Béla Bartók and Bohuslav Martinů with the Czech Radio Symphony Orchestra, which was listed among Gramophone’s Top 10 CDs in 2007. He made the first complete recording of the Czech composer Jindřich Feld’s sonatas for viola and piano, further he recorded the B‑flat major concerto by A. Stamic and produced the world premiere recording of the viola concerto by F. Domažlický (1966) with the Czech Radio Symphony Orchestra. Several of his CDs have been selected as Classic CD’s “Choice of the Month” and praised in The Strad and Gramophone.
Composer(s)
Adam Skoumal is known to the audiences in Europe, USA, and Japan as one of the foremost Czech pianists and composers. He has appeared as soloist with leading Czech and Slovak orchestras (e.g., under the baton of Petr Altrichter, Serge Baudo, Lukasz Borowitz, Jiří Kout, Leoš Svárovský, Jakub Hrůša, Stanislav Vavřínek, Petr Vronský, Andreas Sebastian Weiser) and anumber of European orchestras, such as the Bamberger Symphoniker led by Jonathan Nott. In past years, he has performed at the concert series organized by the Czech Philharmonic, Prague Symphony Orchestra, Prague Chamber Philharmonia, Pilsen Philharmonia, Carlsbad Symphony Orchestra and at festivals such as Prague Spring, Prague Autumn, Janacek May Ostrava, Lípa Musica, Concentus Moraviae and Moravian Autumn. He regularly travels abroad with the Czech National Theatre Orchestra.
The first public recognition of Adam Skoumal as a composer occurred in the Prague Spring Competition 1998, when his playing of his own composition won a special prize for the best performance of a Czech contemporary piece. In 2006, he premiered his First Piano Concerto with the Prague Philharmonia and he also played his Second Piano Concerto with the Chamber Philharmonic Orchestra of South Bohemia in the same year. In the spring 2008, Shlomo Mintz premiered Skoumal's composition for violin and piano called "Djinnia" in Dubrovnik. Since then, Mr.Mintz has played the piece several times on his tour through South America and also in Rome and Milano in Italy. The orchestral version of Djinnia was performed in 2013 by Jiří Bělohlávek with Prague Philharmonia and broadcasted live on Czech TV. Another violin composition, "Variations on a Gypsy Melody", was chosen to be an obligatory piece in the International Violin Competition in Sion, Switzerland in 2009, as well as the First International Violin Competition in Buenos Aires, Argentina 2010.
Adam Skoumal studied at the Prague Conservatoire and the Academy of Performing Arts (under Jan Panenka and Peter Toperczer) and then continued abroad at prestigious universities in the USA. He won scholarships first at the SMU School of Arts in Dallas, Texas and two years later at the Manhattan School of Music, New York, where he was a protege of Ruth Laredo. During his studies he participated in several international master-classes given by such pianists as Lazar Berman, Philippe Entremont, András Schiff, Eugen Indjic and Marián Lapšanský.
Adam Skoumal won 1st prize in the Czech Conservatoires Competition, and in 1998 he won 2nd prize in the Prague Spring International Competition. He was also a prize-winner in other international competitions: Portugal (Porto 1999), Italy (Pinerolo 1999), USA (T. Leschetizky Competition) and a finalist in many other competitions, such as the W. Naumburg Competition and East & West Artists Competition in New York. In 2001, he won the main prize at the Young Podium Festival in Carlsbad for his performance of Rachmaninoff's Third Concerto.
Since 2012, he has passed his rich artistic experience on to his students at the Prague Conservatory, where he teaches the piano and chamber music performance.
Beyond performing the traditional classical repertoire and seldom-heard concertos (Dvořák, Novák), Adam Skoumal often includes his own compositions. He has also made several CD, Radio and TV recordings, including concertos by Rachmaninoff.
Aleksandr Konstantinovich Glazunov,
(b St Petersburg, 29 July/10 Aug 1865; d Paris, 21 March 1936). Russian composer. His father was a book publisher, his mother a pianist. Gifted with an exceptional ear and musical memory, he began to study the piano at the age of nine and to compose at the age of 11; his first teacher was Ėlenkovsky. In 1879 he met Balakirev, who recommended Rimsky-Korsakov as a private composition teacher. These studies lasted less than two years as the pupil progressed ‘not from day to day but from hour to hour’, in Rimsky-Korsakov's words. A lifelong friendship developed between teacher and student, despite the difference in age. When he was 16 Glazunov completed his First Symphony, which was given a successful première on 29 March 1882 under Balakirev's direction. In November of the same year Glazunov's First String Quartet was performed. His precocious talent aroused the interest of the art patron Mitrofan Belyayev, who devoted his immense fortune to furthering the career of Glazunov and the younger generation of Russian composers. In 1885 Belyayev organized the Russian Symphony Concerts in St Petersburg and a music publishing house in Leipzig. The ‘Belyayev Circle’, as it became known, assembled every Friday in the palatial home of the patron, and Glazunov, despite his youth, became a prominent member, with Rimsky-Korsakov, Lyadov, Vītols, Blumenfeld, V.V. Ėval'd and others. In a way, the Belyayev Circle continued from where The Five had left off, but with an important difference: by the 1880s, the battle for a national Russian school had been won; the Belyayev Circle consolidated the gains and effected a rapprochement with the West. As Rimsky-Korsakov said: ‘The Balakirev circle represented a period of battle and pressure on behalf of the development of Russian music’.
Dmitri Shostakovich: (b St Petersburg, 12/25 Sept 1906; d Moscow, 9 Aug 1975). Russian composer. He is generally regarded as the greatest symphonist of the mid-20th century, and many of his string quartets, concertos, instrumental and vocal works are also firmly established in the repertory. His numerous film scores, extensive incidental theatre music and three ballets are of more variable quality. In 1936, political intervention cut short his potentially outstanding operatic output; such interference continued to blight his career, belying the outward signs of official favour and recognition that increasingly came his way. Amid the conflicting pressures of official requirements, the mass suffering of his fellow countrymen, and his personal ideals of humanitarianism and public service, he succeeded in forging a musical language of colossal emotional power. The music of his middle period is often epic in scale and content; it has been understood by many Russians, and in more recent years also by Westerners, as chronicling his society and times, conveying moods and, as some would argue, experiences and even political messages in notes, at a time when to do so in words was proscribed. Since the appearance in 1979 of his purported memoirs, which expressed profound disaffection from the Soviet regime, his works have been intensely scrutinized for evidence of such explicit communication. However, his intentions in this respect continue to provoke disagreement, not least because of the problematic status of the sources involved. He published articles and made speeches under varying degrees of duress; for much of his life his correspondence was liable to be read by censors; he destroyed almost all letters sent to him; he kept no diary; and his reported confidences to friends and family are of varying reliability. Meanwhile, the musical dimensions of his works remain comparatively little examined. He played a decisive role in the musical life of the former Soviet Union, as teacher, writer and administrator. He was also an active pianist, frequently performing his own works until disability prevented him. His last concert appearance was in 1966
Mikhail Ivanovich Glinka (b Novospasskoye, nr Yelnya, Smolensk district, 20 May/1 June 1804; d Berlin, 15 Feb 1857). Russian composer. He was the first Russian composer to combine distinction in speaking the musical idiom of the day with a personal and strongly original voice. Emerging from the background of a provincial dilettante, though with generous access to local music-making opportunties, he made himself at home in metropolitan centres and mastered the procedures of Italian and French opera, and complemented that expertise with skill in motivic and contrapuntal working as well as instrumentation. His compositions, especially the operas A Life for the Tsar and Ruslan and Lyudmila and the orchestral fantasia Kamarinskaya, represent cornerstones of what are known as the ‘Russian classics’, and furnished models for later 19th-century composers.
Modest Musorgsky (b Karevo, Pskov district, 9/21 March 1839; d St Petersburg, 16/28 March 1881). Russian composer. His life was disjointed, ending in loneliness and poverty, and at the time of his death some of his most important compositions were left unfinished. His greatest achievements were as a composer of operas and solo songs. Largely self-taught and highly intellectual, he discovered a way of writing for the voice that was both lyrical and true to the inflections of speech. He was the most strikingly individual Russian composer of the later 19th century and an avatar of modernism for the generation of Debussy and Ravel.
Niccolò Paganini: (b Genoa, 27 Oct 1782; d Nice, 27 May 1840). Italian violinist and composer. By his development of technique, his exceptional skills and his extreme personal magnetism he not only contributed to the history of the violin as its most famous virtuoso but also drew the attention of other Romantic composers, notably Liszt, to the significance of virtuosity as an element in art. As a composer of a large number of chamber works, mostly with or for guitar, Paganini was influential in furthering the performance and appreciation of music in private circles.
Piotr Ilich Tchaikovsky: (b Kamsko-Votkinsk, Vyatka province, 25 April/7 May 1840; d St Petersburg, 25 Oct/6 Nov 1893). Russian composer. He was the first composer of a new Russian type, fully professional, who firmly assimilated traditions of Western European symphonic mastery; in a deeply original, personal and national style he united the symphonic thought of Beethoven and Schumann with the work of Glinka, and transformed Liszt’s and Berlioz’s achievements in depictive-programmatic music into matters of Shakespearian elevation and psychological import (Boris Asaf’yev).
Robert Schumann: (b Zwickau, Saxony, 8 June 1810; d Endenich, nr Bonn, 29 July 1856). German composer and music critic. While best remembered for his piano music and songs, and some of his symphonic and chamber works, Schumann made significant contributions to all the musical genres of his day and cultivated a number of new ones as well. His dual interest in music and literature led him to develop a historically informed music criticism and a compositional style deeply indebted to literary models. A leading exponent of musical Romanticism, he had a powerful impact on succeeding generations of European composers.
Sergey Rachmaninov: (b Oneg, 20 March/1 April 1873; d Beverly Hills, CA, 28 March 1943). Russian composer, pianist and conductor. He was one of the finest pianists of his day and, as a composer, the last great representative of Russian late Romanticism. The influences of Tchaikovsky, Rimsky-Korsakov and other Russian composers soon gave way to a thoroughly personal idiom, with a pronounced lyrical quality, expressive breadth, structural ingenuity and a palette of rich, distinctive orchestral colours.
Sergey Prokofiev (b Sontsovka, Bakhmutsk region, Yekaterinoslav district, Ukraine, 11/23 April 1891; d Moscow, 5 March 1953). Russian composer and pianist. He began his career as a composer while still a student, and so had a deep investment in Russian Romantic traditions – even if he was pushing those traditions to a point of exacerbation and caricature – before he began to encounter, and contribute to, various kinds of modernism in the second decade of the new century. Like many artists, he left his country directly after the October Revolution; he was the only composer to return, nearly 20 years later. His inner traditionalism, coupled with the neo-classicism he had helped invent, now made it possible for him to play a leading role in Soviet culture, to whose demands for political engagement, utility and simplicity he responded with prodigious creative energy. In his last years, however, official encouragement turned into persecution, and his musical voice understandably faltered.