Description
About A DUE
It’s not uncommon for a musicologist to be asked by people who are interested in classical music: “But what is a continuo?” There is no simple answer because that word – crucial as it is for understanding the composition and performance practice of the 17th and 18th centuries – is an umbrella term under which many different realities find refuge.
Literally, continuo means “continuous”; it is an adjective that implies a noun, i.e. basso. “Basso” refers to the lowest line of a musical composition. In the golden era of polyphony, the bass was one among several equal voices of the contrapuntal texture – it intervened as frequently or as rarely as every other part, and engaged in imitating the musical material of the others. Therefore, the bass line, just as any voice, was characterized by both notes and rests, by musical phrases and silence in between.
Due to numerous historical and aesthetic reasons – including the influence of Humanism which stressed the importance of text intelligibility – the intricate polyphonies of the 14th-16th centuries progressively gave way to “homophony”, which is a different kind of compositional technique. Instead of voices entering and exiting the musical structure independently, now they tended to sing in rhythmic unison. This allowed for a much better understanding of the text, but changed the way of writing music from polyphony to harmony, from the imitative style to the chordal style. This in turn prompted an epoch-making shift of paradigm, from modality in the middle ages and renaissance, to tonality, the system typical of the modern era.
Since the voices now tended to move together, it was possible to sing just one of them, typically the uppermost, and to play the others on an instrument capable of producing chords – typically the lute, or keyboard instruments such as the clavichord. This in turn undermined the equality which had characterized the relationship between voices in a polyphonic texture until then. The uppermost part, i.e. the soprano, became the most important line, but the bass line also acquired pre-eminence, since it determined the harmony above it.
Thus the character of the bass voice changed, from the previously typical melodic line – including rests like any other part – to a “continuous” (instrumental) line. It was the “basso continuo”.
So, this is how the continuo was born; but this has not really answered our musical friend’s question: “But what is a continuo?”. It is not an instrument, like a bassoon or a harpsichord. It is, one might say, a technique; but it is also “something” which actually sounds, even though, again, it is not an instrument. It is – normally – a small ensemble whose line-up is generally left to the performers’ choice. Nowadays, the continuo is performed with one or more melodic, low-pitched instruments, such as the cello, the viola da gamba, or the bassoon, and one or more “harmonic” instruments, such as the theorbo, the harpsichord, the organ, the lute or any other instrument capable of producing chordal progressions. The melodic instrument(s) play the bass line, while the others “realize” the continuo, i.e. perform the chords which are normally indicated through a special system of ciphering called “figured bass” – for instance, in one system a triad in the root position is indicated as “5 3”.
This brings us to what is distinctive about this original and unusual Da Vinci Classics album. Any given series of chords has a bass line – albeit probably ungrammatical – formed of its lowest notes. One might imagine, however, that a solo bass line does not necessarily communicate harmony; however, the human mind (particularly if it is familiar with the processes of european tonal harmony) tends to “fill” the gaps in the harmony, just as happens with optical phenomena – think of a half-hidden silhouette whose shape is easily reconstructed by our brain. This is the principle upon which works for unaccompanied melodic instruments, such as Bach’s violin Sonatas and Partitas, or his Suites for violoncello are built. Given a bass and a soprano line, it is easy to imagine the harmonic filling, and this in fact happens quite unconsciously.
It was upon just this principle that this album was conceived; no arbitrary decision, since it merely reflects common practices of the Baroque era.
Indeed it was historically documented practice for the great violinists and composers of the italian Baroque – Corelli, Tartini and Veracini – to undertake entire concert tours exclusively with their cellists: i.e. a soprano line (the violin) and its continuo (the cello). Nowadays, people are used to accompanying violin sonatas with a keyboard instrument. However, when two string instruments combine to perform these works, the music is created in a completely new way. On the one hand, the reduction of complexity in the basso continuo poses new challenges to the cellist; on the other, a duo of violin and cello opens up entirely new, almost orchestral sonorities. With this idea in mind, the recording artists have made a selection of interesting pieces that highlight the strengths of this instrumentation, including a hitherto unrecorded composition by Giovanni Mossi.
There are some fascinating period sources which confirm the widespread dissemination of this practice. For instance, Giuseppe Tartini traveled to Prague with his friend Antonio Vandini, the first violoncellist of the Paduan chapel. Similarly, Arcangelo Corelli performed with the cellist Francischello, and Francesco Veracini with Salvatore Lanzetti; there was also the famous case of double-bassist Dragonetti and cellist Lindley at the Italian Theatre in London from 1794 until 1846, a duo that was celebrated for their interpretations of continuo parts in recitatives, and which also performed solo concerts where the double bass was the continuo for the solo violoncello. As Lew Solomonowitsch Ginsburg and Albert Palm affirm, “when the violinist of the time performed sonatas for violin and bass, he usually traveled together with the cellist, who accompanied him from the single-line bass part, as a harpsichordist or organist did by no means always play the bass part together with the cellist. In the absence of a keyboard instrument, the role of the accompanist on the cello was one of particular responsibility. At that time, the art of accompaniment was of special importance as it required tonal-musical taste, sensitivity, a precise knowledge of harmony and polyphony, improvisational skills and experience”.
Charles Burney – one of the most authoritative sources for 18th century music – wrote regarding Veracini: “Being called upon, [Veracini] would not play a concerto, but desired [to] play a solo at the bottom of the choir, desiring Lanzetti, the violoncellist of Turin to accompany him; when he played in such a manner as to extort an e viva! in the public church. And whenever he was about to make a close, he turned to Laurenti, and called out: ‘Cosi si suona per fare il primo violino’: ‘this is the way to play the first fiddle’”.
Recent research by Giovanna Barbati indicates that cello players trained in the Italian partimento tradition were expected not only to play the written notes, but to engage in harmonic realization of the bass line, enriching it with embellishments and diminutions. Indeed, the study of the partimento technique and of its teaching in the Neapolitan Conservatories suggests that all instrumentalists of that time were educated to be capable of improvising and composing over a bass line. This skill, once acquired, was unlikely to remain dormant, but was very probably put to use in concert practice.
The recording artists, inspired by the titles of opuses by Corelli and Tartini, which read ‘per violino e violone/violoncello o cembalo’, began to question whether the ‘o’ (‘or’) might imply performance alternatives – and concluded that the pieces could indeed be performed as duos. The term “Violone” was used to describe many different instruments, but always referred to bass string instruments, and in this case probably the modern form of the cello, since it is documented that Corelli and Veracini travelled with their own cellists.
This notion was further corroborated by the artists’ observation that Mossi’s sonatas op. 5 are titled “12 Sonate o sinfonie a violino solo con il violoncello”, not even mentioning another instrument for the continuo. The bass line includes figures, but since Giovanna Barbati’s research suggests that cellists were expected to realize the harmonies, this does not indicate that the part was actually meant for a keyboard instrument. Continuo chords could also have been added for monetary purposes when it was published, in order to reach a wider audience.
Among the recorded works some highlights should be pointed out. First is the very interesting and unusual form of Mascitti’s Suite, which is an instrumental retelling of the famous Greek myth of Eros and Psyche, illustrated through a series of dances and of mini-suites evoking the various moments of their love-story.
Another composer worth mentioning here is Elisabeth Jacquet de la Guerre, one of the most interesting female composers of the Baroque era. Her sonatas have a very prominent Italian stylistic influence. Considering the movement of the bass line, her sonatas are more in the form of a “duo” between the upper voice and the bass, and are in this way similar to the compositions of Corelli, Veracini and Tartini. Although the title only mentions the cembalo as a continuo instrument, her writing allows for performance with cello only. The same applies to Mascitti and Veracini, whose title pages mention only “basso/basso continuo”, but whose scoring – also in consideration of Veracini’s documented cooperation with a cellist – seems to support this particular performance.
Also worth mentioning is the special form of Veracini’s sonata, which is a compilation of two works. The artists followed Veracini’s suggestion in the preface of this opus to combine the sonatas to form a new composition consisting of two or three movements. In this CD the sonata no. 5 and the capriccio no. 6 have been combined.
Finally, with regard to Fontana, the performers consider the modern violoncello sufficiently similar to the instruments named in the score – ‘fagotto, chitarone, violoncino o simile altro istromento’ – and contend that this explicit openness to alternative instrumentation supports their historically informed choice, despite the cello not yet existing in its current form at the time. He scores his composition for a high and a low voice; at that time it was common practice for both parts to be embellished with diminutions. The artists see a clear trajectory from this custom of melodic improvisation, to the practice of embellished continuo realisation on a bass stringed instrument, accompanying the ornamented melody in the high voice. The bass line is thus ‘realised’ in a proper sense – its latent harmonic content is unfolded.
Taken together, these works trace a compelling path through the diverse possibilities available to performers. Such choices, though frequently underexplored, vividly demonstrate the expressive range afforded by historically informed performance practice.
Chiara Bertoglio © 2025
Like this:
Like Loading...
Artist(s)
Rebecca Raimondi
‘The driving force in these works was the italian violinist Rebecca Raimondi, who also completely won over the audience as the soloist in Johann Georg Pisendel's Violin Concerto: she appears as a mature personality in whom sovereign skill, meticulous work on the musical text, emotionality and musicality come together to form a natural whole. We will hopefully be hearing a lot more from this violinist[...]’.
Doris Kösterke, ‘with Bach's grandfather’, 02/02/2022, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
Rebecca Raimondi is a lecturer in baroque violin at the Frankfurt University of Music and Performing Arts, and enjoys the support of the Jumpstart Jr. Foundation, which has provided her with a violin by Gennaro Gagliano from 1732.
In 2022 she won first prize in the ‘Marco Uccellini’ competition, and in the same year completed her studies at the University of Music and Performing Arts in Frankfurt am Main in the class of Prof. Petra Müllejans and Mechthild Karkow, graduating with top grades. She currently attends masterclasses with Enrico Onofri.
A co-founder and member of the ensembles ‘La Tabatière’, ‘Cappella Sollertia’, ‘Duo Raimondi Demgenski’ and ‘Duo Amüsant’, she regularly plays with various famous orchestras such as the ‘Freiburg Baroque Orchestra’ and the ‘Orchestra of the Eighteenth Century’, alongside her commitments as concertmaster and soloist with the ‘Orquestra barroca casa da Musica’ (Porto), ‘La Stagione Frankfurt’ and the ‘Neumeyer Consort’.
In 2023 she was artistic director of the Höri Musiktage and the Lienzingen Festival.
She is also the founder of the spectacle ‘Commedia Instrumentale’, a work that focuses on the cultural exchange between Commedia dell'Arte and baroque music.
As a chamber musician and soloist, she has recorded CDs for Sheva Contemporary, Brilliant, Stradivarius and Grand Piano (Naxos), KHA and NovAntiqua.
In 2018 she completed her fellowship programm with Prof. Jacqueline Ross at the Guildhall School of Music & Drama in London, where she also studied with David Takeno and Pavlo Beznosiuk.
She has studied in Italy with Salvatore Accardo, Marco Fiorini, Lorenzo Fabiani and Roberto Gonzalez Monjas. In 2014, she completed her bachelor's degree in the class of Antonio De Secondi at the Conservatorio in Latina ‘O. Respighi’.
In 2013 she received the ‘Excellentissimus’ prize from the association ‘Le Cattedrali Letterarie’, signed by the President of the Italian Republic.
Sylvia Demgenski
Sharing music in all its complexity and emotional power is one of the most important experiences for cellist and baroque cellist Sylvia Demgenski. Her playing style, both sensitive and passionate, characterises her work with various ensembles such as the ‘Duo Raimondi Demgenski’, ‘Duo Mousiké’, ‘Trio Radiant’, BaroqueLAB Frankfurt and the ‘Kammerphilharmonie Frankfurt’. She recently launched her own concert series ‘Barock²’, was director of the ‘1:1 CONCERTS der Freien Klassikszene Frankfurt’ and was artistic director of the chamber music festival ‘Les Müsicales de Saint-Faust’ in 2023.
A foundational source of inspiration, both musical and personal, was her time studying with Prof. Kristin von der Goltz, with whom she completed her master's degree in baroque cello in 2020. Prof. Enrico Bronzi at the University Mozarteum in Salzburg opened up new and profound perspectives on the handling of musical material during her master's degree on the modern instrument, and with Xenia Jankovic at the HfM Detmold she received the fundamental training that defines her as a musician today. Other formative encounters include those with musicians such as Michael Schneider, András Schiff and Jesper Christensen.
In her free time, Sylvia enjoys spending time in nature and feeling deeply connected to the world. Since 2023 she is the proud mother of a wonderful little boy.
Composer(s)
Arcangelo Corelli (b Fusignano, 17 Feb 1653; d Rome, 8 Jan 1713). Italian composer and violinist. Despite the modest size of his output, comprising six collections of instrumental music and a handful of other authentic works, and its virtual restriction to three genres – solo sonata, trio sonata and concerto – Corelli exercised an unparalleled influence during his lifetime and for a long time afterwards. This influence, which affected form, style and instrumental technique in equal measure, was most closely felt in Italy, and in particular in Rome, where he settled in early manhood, but soon spread beyond local and national confines to become a European phenomenon. As a violinist, teacher of the violin and director of instrumental ensembles Corelli imposed standards of discipline that were unusually strict for their period and helped to lay the groundwork for further progress along the same lines during the 18th century. To Corelli belong equally the distinctions of being the first composer to derive his fame exclusively from instrumental composition, the first to owe his reputation in large part to the activity of music publishers, and the first to produce ‘classic’ instrumental works which were admired and studied long after their idiom became outmoded.
Elisabeth Jacquet de La Guerre(b Paris, bap. 17 March 1665; d Paris,27 June 1729). French harpsichordist and composer. She came from a family of master masons and musicians (see Jacquet family), and from the age of five played the harpsichord and sang at the court of Louis XIV. Noticed by Madame de Montespan, she stayed for three years in her entourage. On 23 September 1684 she left the court to marry the organist Marin de La Guerre. Their son, as precociously gifted as his mother, died at the age of ten.
In Paris Elisabeth Jacquet gave lessons and concerts for which she was soon renowned throughout the city. Her first compositions were dramatic works, of which only the libretto of Jeux à l'honneur de la victoiresurvives. Her first publication, Les pièces de clavessin … premier livre, dates from 1687. In 1694 her only tragédie en musique, Céphale et Procris, was performed at the Académie Royale de Musique with little success, but the prologue was revived in 1696 at Strasbourg, where Sébastien de Brossard had founded an academy of music. In 1695 Brossard made copies of her first trio sonatas and those for violin and continuo. Only in 1707 did she publish her six Sonates pour le viollon et pour le clavecin and the Pièces de clavecin qui peuvent se jouer sur le viollon, followed later by her two collections of Cantates françoises sur des sujets tirez de l'Ecriture to texts by Antoine Houdar de Lamotte, and by three secular Cantates françoises. Whereas all her other works were dedicated to Louis XIV, this last was addressed to the Elector of Bavaria, Maximilian II Emanuel. Le raccommodement comique de Pierrot et de Nicole is a duet which went into La ceinture de Vénus, a play by Alain-René Lesage performed at the Foire St Germain in 1715. Elisabeth Jacquet's last work seems to have been a Te Deum sung in August 1721 in the chapel of the Louvre in thanksgiving for the recovery of Louis XV from smallpox.
Francesco Maria Veracini
(b Florence, 1 Feb 1690; d Florence, 31 Oct 1768). Italian composer and violinist. Veracini was born into a family of musicians and artists. His grandfather was one of the first violinists of Florence; his uncle Antonio Veracini was that and a fine composer as well. Francesco Maria’s father Agostino was, ironically, one of the few Veracinis who did not play the violin even as an amateur; he was a druggist and undertaker. Veracini’s early training was provided by his uncle Antonio with whom the promising boy often performed in public. His other instructors in Florence were G.M. Casini and his assistant Francesco Feroci. In particular, Casini, the organist at Florence Cathedral and composer of church music in a highly individual, neo-Palestrinian style, left his mark upon Veracini’s subsequent works. His last teacher was apparently G.A. Bernabei, with whom he may have studied in 1715 when he was in southern Germany. There is no solid evidence that he studied with Corelli, as is sometimes asserted.
Italian composer and violinist. Knowledge of his life and work is confined to a few documents, the most extensive of which is the preface to a posthumous memorial publication, Sonate a 1. 2. 3. per il violino, o cornetto, fagotto, chitarone, violoncino o simile altro istromento (Venice, 1641/R1985; examples in AMI, vii, 92; HAM, no.198; Mw, xv, 1960; Diletto musicale, xiii–xv, 1962, and cdxlii, 1969; ed. F. Cerha, Vienna and Munich, 1976). He is described as being from Brescia and as having also worked in Venice, Rome and finally Padua. His death was attributed to ‘the voracity of the pestilence’, that raged in northern Italy in the years 1630–31. Another Brescian, Cesario Gussago, dedicated a sonata to him (in RISM 16082). Other documents may refer to the musician. One of them, a property assessment of 1627 for a Gio: Batta Fontana, gives his age as 38, his residence as Padua, and refers to extensive connections with Brescia. An atto di morte dated 7 September 1630 for a “Zan Batta Fontana” aged 50, is the only one among the Paduan death registers of 1625–30 for a person bearing that name (see Baroncini).
The 1641 collection comprises six sonatas for solo violin and continuo and 12 ensemble sonatas for one to three violins and continuo, the latter group often including a technically demanding concertante part for bassoon or cello. None of the individual works can be firmly dated: it can only be stated that they represent sonata composition probably from its beginnings to about 1630. All are divisible into numerous contrasting sections; in about a third of them some sections are repeated, suggesting an arch form. Repeated periods are often elaborated with diminutions. Except for a few short sections recalling the style of vocal recitative, the melodic material is on the whole related to that found in canzonas and dance pieces of the period. A nervous, variegated rhythmic idiom is found in some of these works; the sixth sonata, for example, abounds with sudden bursts of diminutions and triplets. The underlying contrapuntal and harmonic vocabulary is quite conservative, with the bass line often a regular voice part rather than a truly accompanimental line. Works such as sonatas 5, 6 and 16 show Fontana to be a leading figure in the early development of the sonata, especially the solo sonata, of which he and Marini were the first important composers.
Giovanni Mossi
(b ?Rome, c1680; d Rome, 1742). Italian composer and violinist. In the frontispieces of his first five collections he is referred to as Roman. This is probably true, since three other members of the family are known to have been in Rome between the 1670s and the 1730s: his father, Bartolomeo, and brother Giuseppe (both viola players), and Gaetano Mossi, a tenor at the papal chapel. This suggests that it was Bartolomeo who introduced Giovanni into the musical circles of Rome, where he was active as a violinist from 1694. His career there can be divided into three periods. Until 1715 he appeared regularly as an instrumentalist at the private courts of cardinals and princes, or in ecclesiastical cappelle. The second period, 1716–33, is marked by an outburst of compositional activity in instrumental genres; his work as a violinist continued as before, but in a span of 15 years he published in Amsterdam his entire catalogue of works: three sets of sonatas and three of concertos. During the third period, from 1733 until his death, he gave up composition and gradually reduced his professional commitments. His only stable position seems to have been as virtuoso at the court of Baldassarre Odescalchi (from 1709 Duke of Bracciano). It has not yet been possible to establish with certainty the duration of the engagement, but it was probably brief: evidence shows that in 1711 he was already in service, but five years later the frontispiece of op.1 made no mention of it. It is not clear what his relations were with Cardinal Wolfgang Hannibal Schrattenbach, Princess Vittoria Altieri Pallavicini and Cardinal Pietro Ottoboni, to whom opp.1, 4 and 6 respectively were dedicated.
Giuseppe Tartini: (b Pirano, Istria [now Piran, Istra, Slovenia], 8 April 1692; d Padua, 26 Feb 1770). Italian composer, violinist, teacher and theorist.
Tartini’s father Giovanni Antonio, of Florentine origin, was general manager of the salt mills in Pirano. Giuseppe, destined for the church by his pious parents, was to have been first a minore conventuale, a branch of the Franciscan order, and subsequently a full priest. To this end he was educated in his native town and then in nearby Capodistria (now Koper, Slovenia) at the scuole pie; as well as the humanities and rhetoric, he studied the rudiments of music. In 1708 he left his native region, never to live there again, but carrying in his memory the peculiarities of the local musical folklore. He enrolled as a law student at Padua University, where he devoted most of his time, always dressed as a priest, to improving his fencing, a practice in which, according to contemporary accounts, few could compete with him. This account of Tartini’s youth has been questioned (see, for instance, Capri), but it is supported by contemporary evidence and is consistent with the later development of his personality, characterized by a fiery and stubborn temperament with a strong tendency towards mysticism. These qualities are equally evident in his writings – both letters and theoretical works – and in his compositions.
A few months after his father’s death, Tartini openly rebelled against his parents’ intentions, and on 29 July 1710 he married Elisabetta Premazore, a girl of lower social standing and two years his elder. He was then compelled to leave Padua and took refuge in the convent of S Francesco in Assisi, where he was sheltered by the superior, Padre G.B. Torre, from Pirano. There Tartini remained for at least three years, devoting himself determinedly to practising the violin, always without tuition. Although direct evidence is lacking, he probably studied composition during this period with Padre Bohuslav Černohorský, then organist of the basilica in Assisi.
With the death of Father Torre, Tartini lost his protector and was obliged to support himself as a violinist. We learn from his Trattato di musica that in 1714 he was in the orchestra of the Ancona opera house, and he claimed that it was then that he discovered the ‘terzo suono’ (combination tone), the acoustical phenomenon that was to play a fundamental role in his theoretical system as well as in his composing and playing techniques. In July 1716 he heard Veracini play at a musical academy in the Mocenigo palace in Venice, and was so impressed by his style, especially by his bow technique, that he decided to return to the Marches in order to perfect his own playing; in Carnival 1717–18 he was first violin in the opera house orchestra in Fano. His activities during the next two years are not known, but presumably involved commuting between the Veneto and the Marches in order to play in academies, church services and opera performances, as well as teaching. He was in Venice early in 1721, when he had as a pupil the young Gerolamo Ascanio Giustiniani, the future translator of the Psalms for Benedetto Marcello and the dedicatee of Tartini’s own violin sonatas published as op.1 in 1734 by Le Cène in Amsterdam.
Thanks to the intervention of Gerolamo Ascanio’s father, Tartini was appointed primo violino e capo di concerto at the basilica of S Antonio in Padua (known as ‘Il Santo’) on 16 April 1721; the proceedings of the appointments board expressly stated that Tartini was exempt from the usual examination because of his acknowledged perfection in the profession, and he was at the same time granted complete freedom to play in opera and musical academies whenever he so wished. The document is in itself proof of the high reputation Tartini had by then acquired. Taking advantage of the permission he was granted, he took part in occasional performances in Parma (1728), Bologna (1730), Camerino (1735), Ferrara (1739) and, most frequently, Venice.
In 1723 Tartini was invited by his lifelong friend and colleague, the cellist Antonio Vandini (the source of the earliest biographical information about Tartini), to join him in Prague in performances connected with the coronation of Emperor Charles VI as king of Bohemia. Tartini’s ready acceptance resulted partly from a wish to avoid a scandal about to erupt in Padua, provoked by a Venetian innkeeper who accused him of fathering her recently born child. Tartini remained for three years in Prague in the service of the Kinsky family, and enjoyed contacts there with Prince Lobkowitz’s household as well as with the musicians Fux, Caldara and S.L. Weiss. The bad climate and resulting health problems obliged him – ‘against his will’, as he said in a family letter – to return in 1726 to S Antonio in Padua, where he remained for the rest of his life.
The following year Tartini began his violin school, which soon became famous and was labelled ‘the school of the nations’ because students came to it from all over Europe. It was probably about this time that he began his relationship, mainly epistolary, with Padre Martini in Bologna, which lasted for the rest of his life. Also about this time (c1730) Le Cène of Amsterdam brought out Tartini’s first published works, 12 concertos op.1, books 1 and 3. In spite of repeated invitations from France, Germany and especially England, Tartini firmly refused to leave Padua, just as he always declined to write for the stage. Several travellers visited him: in 1739 De Brosses reported at length in his Lettres familières on the excellent impression the violinist made on him, but there is no evidence of a supposed journey to Rome in 1740. About this time Tartini suffered a stroke which partly paralysed his left arm and affected his playing. Frequent contacts with the cultural milieu in Padua, and especially with his countryman Gianrinaldo Carli, professor of astronomy at Padua University, fostered the change in Tartini’s conception of music from that of a purely abstract construction of sounds to that of an expressive language capable of moving the listeners’ affections. The discussions concerned also theoretical subjects, dealing with the physical and mathematical principles behind musical phenomena; but Tartini’s interest in – or indeed his passion for – these matters dates from much earlier, and was promoted also by the presence in Padua of two Franciscans who were maestri di cappella of the institution in which he served and also deeply involved in the same theoretical matters: Francesco Calegari, who held the office from 1703 to 1727, and his successor Francesco Antonio Vallotti.
As time went by, Tartini devoted himself less to playing and composing, concentrating his energies (apart from those used for teaching) almost exclusively on theoretical speculation. By 1750, as can be inferred from his correspondence, the text of what was to become the Trattato di musica secondo la vera scienza dell’armonia was complete, and it was circulated to the ‘learned world’ (as Tartini himself called it) to be evaluated and discussed. Padre Martini and the mathematician Lodovico Balbi, both in Bologna, were rather sceptical of the hypotheses expounded in the treatise, which was eventually published in 1754 with the financial support of Count Decio Agostino Trento, its dedicatee. Criticism continued after publication, emphasizing that it was written in a deliberately obscure style. Tartini decided therefore on a plainer and more comprehensible presentation of his ideas in his next printed treatise, De’ principi dell’armonia musicale contenuta nel diatonico genere, completed in 1764 and published in 1767. In between these publications, and even after, he wrote several shorter theoretical texts, principally to defend his convictions against attacks coming mainly from Italian mathematicians and foreign music theorists. Not all judgments were unfavourable, however; D’Alembert, in his Elémens de musique, expressed support for Tartini’s ideas, and J.-J. Rousseau took the trouble of including an extensive and thorough résumé of them in the article ‘Système’ in his Dictionnaire de musique (1768). But Rousseau’s concept of harmony was too close to Rameau’s to be acceptable to Tartini, who attacked him in what turned out to be his last published work. Another large theoretical text, Dell’armonia musicale fondata sul cerchio, remained unpublished until modern times.
Throughout his life Tartini was harassed by requests for financial help from his family in Pirano, which obliged him to devote his last years more than ever to teaching; but he was also obsessed by the incomprehension with which his theories and ideas were met. After the death of his wife, Vandini joined him to spend their last years together. Tartini died on 26 February 1770; he bequeathed his musical and theoretical manuscripts to his nephew Pietro.
PIERLUIGI PETROBELLI from The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians
Michele [Michel, Miquel] Mascitti,
(b Chieti, nr Naples, 1663 or 1664; d Paris, 24 April 1760). Italian composer and violinist. He was taught by his uncle, Pietro Marchitelli, who was attached to the royal chapel of Naples and to the church of S Bartolomeo as a violinist. Marchitelli procured for his young nephew the post of a ‘supernumerary violinist’ in the royal chapel with the prospect of a permanency later, but Mascitti preferred to seek his fortune abroad. Having travelled through Italy, Germany and the Netherlands, he settled in Paris in 1704. He soon attracted the attention of the Duke of Orléans and through him gained the opportunity to play before the king, the dauphin and the whole court. Mascitti became a figurehead of Italian instrumental music in France and was regarded as the peer of Corelli and Albinoni. Possessing the advantage over his fellow-nationals of residence in Paris, where all nine of his published collections were first issued between 1704 and 1738, Mascitti enjoyed enormous popularity with the French public, to whom he was affectionately known by his first name Michele in various gallicized forms. In the Low Countries and England, where his music was extensively reprinted, his reputation was less exceptional, though still considerable. He entered the service of the Duke of Orléans and in later years enjoyed the patronage of the influential Crozat family, lodging at the house of Pierre Crozat. In 1739 Mascitti became a French citizen by naturalization. He married in the following year. His last 20 years seem to have been spent in retirement.