Johann Sebastian Bach: Suites Nos. 1, 3 & 5 (Arranged for Flute)

Physical Release: 26 June 2026

Digital Release: 3 July 2026

Additional information

Artist(s)

Composer(s)

EAN Code

Edition

Format

Genre

Instrumentation

Period

Publication year

Description

Few instrumental cycles possess, to the same degree as the Six Suites for solo cello, the force of a canon and the allure of an enigma. Belonging to the Cöthen period and transmitted without an autograph, through copies that have imposed upon performers a true philology of detail, they occupy a central place in the work of Johann Sebastian Bach and in the entire history of instrumental writing. In these pages the cello attains full poetic autonomy. Bach removes it from the sphere of the basso continuo and entrusts to it, at once, harmonic foundation, song and contrapuntal fabric. From this arises that distinctive implicit polyphony which constitutes one of the miracles of the collection: a single line generates space, depth, vertical tension, the memory of chords and even the illusion of several voices in dialogue. The model of the dance suite, inherited from the French tradition, is adopted with absolute lucidity and transformed into a large-scale construction, within which Prélude, Allemande, Courante, Sarabande, the pair of dances and Gigue cease to be juxtaposed episodes and assume the significance of an organic itinerary. The tradition of the sources also contributes to their aura. The copies by Anna Magdalena Bach and Johann Peter Kellner, with their divergences, have made these pages a permanent laboratory of interpretative responsibility, where every slur, every chord and every articulation invites reflection upon the relationship between notation and sound.
The history of reception has given these works an almost novelistic physiognomy. For a long time the Suites remained more present in pedagogical practice and in the memory of players than in concert life. Their full entry into the public repertory is bound to the name of Pablo Casals, whose action carried the weight of a refoundation. Since then their authority has grown without interruption, and with it the geography of transcriptions has widened. Music so intensely harmonic and so firmly constructed invited other instruments to measure themselves against it. The nineteenth century often felt the need to make explicit what Bach leaves implied, and the season of rewritings, from Schumann and Mendelssohn to Busoni, bears witness to a constant desire to interrogate these pages from new vantage points of listening. In the case of the flute, however, the transfer assumes a special significance, because it brings a writing born of the contact between bow and string into the realm of breath, articulation and continuity entrusted to the air column.
The introductory note to the printed edition from which this programme is drawn identifies the essential issue with admirable clarity. Bach himself offers an ideal premise for such a transfer. The Partita in A minor for solo flute shows, indeed, how his imagination could conceive for a wind instrument a writing of exceptional density, often stretched beyond ordinary respiratory conventions. Moreover, Suite No. 5 enjoyed a second life in the lute version BWV 995, an eloquent sign of the inner mobility of this repertory. The transcription for flute is therefore situated within a possibility inscribed in Bach’s own workshop. It demands a particular discipline. Breath shapes the phrase, determines the points of support, regulates the span of the imagined bow-strokes and establishes a hierarchy of accents. Dynamics, in such a context, call for measure and concentration. A restrained palette throws into relief the modulating design, the interplay of appoggiaturas, the weight of pedals and the quality of attack consonants. Even the rendering of double-stops becomes a matter of musical thought before it is one of technique. The transcription set out in the score pursues with consistency the preservation of the original rhythm and carefully distinguishes the harmonic value of the supporting notes from their ornamental function. The editorial note itself insists upon the didactic function of this perspective. In the indications of dynamics, slurs and breaths there emerges an ideal of sobriety that leads the performer back to the heart of the Bachian problem: to perceive the modulations, to grade the articulations, to sustain the continuity of the phrase and to give prominence to the pedals without stiffening the line. What emerges is a reading that regards transcription as an exegetical act, a form of interpretation of the writing.
Suite No. 1 in G major BWV 1007 opens the journey with an almost primordial self-evidence. Its Prélude belongs to that small number of pages in which apparent simplicity coincides with the highest compositional wisdom. The unfolding of the arpeggios, the insistent return of G as a resonant pivot, the gradual expansion of the harmonic field produce the impression of music arising from its own breath. On the cello this page also lives through the sounding matter of the open strings and their persistence; on the flute continuity is entrusted to a different form of mental legato, to the quality of emission and to the capacity to differentiate in timbre the pedal-note from the moving line. The edition itself suggests, at certain points, alternative fingerings designed to render that duality perceptible. The dances confirm the inaugurating character of the Suite. The Allemande unfolds an ordered and supple eloquence; the Courante introduces a more nervous mobility, always held within a profile of limpid elegance; the Sarabande concentrates the discourse in a gathered gravity; the two Menuets restore to the form its social and choreutic origin; the Gigue closes with lucid impetus and with a disciplined joy, wholly contained within Bachian measure. At this first stage the flute brings to light the transparency of the line and makes its architecture almost visible.
Suite No. 3 in C major BWV 1009 enlarges the gesture and projects it into a more open space. C major bestows upon it a luminous firmness, almost monumental. The Prélude announces this quality at once with a broad descending scale that seems to encompass the original instrument in its entirety, before establishing the long axis of G, the fulcrum of the central tension. Here continuity of motion is joined to a strong vertical awareness. The successions of semiquavers always preserve a vivid sense of harmonic direction and impart to the page an energetic nobility, austere and radiant. The Allemande retains a broad, composed and earthy gait; the Courante runs with tightly reined impetus; the Sarabande opens a space of more intense concentration; the two Bourrées graft upon the brightness of C major the shadowed relief of C minor, creating one of the most memorable contrasts in the whole group. The position of the Third Suite, at the centre of this programme, thus assumes a precise symbolic meaning. It represents the full expansion of the idea of the suite, the moment at which the equilibrium between dance, architecture and song reaches an almost classical fullness. Transferred to the flute, it demands a superior control of breath and a phrasing capable of making every pause felt as a formal event. When this necessity is governed with rigour, the page acquires an almost architectural clarity and offers to listening its solid internal framework.
With Suite No. 5 in C minor BWV 1011 the climate changes profoundly. Already in the original it is distinguished by the scordatura, which lowers the highest string and alters the system of resonances, colours and chordal dispositions. Its Prélude adopts the model of the French overture. The opening section, solemn and dotted, introduces an air of ceremonial gravity; the ensuing fugal episode densifies the discourse within a movement of intense concentration, where implicit polyphony attains an extraordinary clarity. The entire Suite stands beneath the sign of an introverted severity. The Allemande weighs every gesture with austere eloquence; the Courante channels energy into a harsher course; the Sarabande touches one of the spiritual summits of Bach’s art, entrusting to a bare and dolorous line the task of evoking on its own its harmonic foundation; the two Gavottes reintroduce a more earthly step without dissolving the prevailing shadow; the Gigue preserves in its dotted rhythm a French memory and an almost theatrical tension. On the flute the Fifth Suite requires a work of timbral interiorisation. The scordatura survives as a mental colour, as density of sound, as gravity of phrasing. The result can attain a rare force, because the disappearance of the materiality of the string accentuates the nakedness of the line and places its essential eloquence in the foreground.
Heard in this succession, the First, Third and Fifth Suites delineate an arc of striking clarity. The first affirms origin and confidence in motion, the third unfolds its luminous fullness, the fifth leads towards a more inward and meditative territory. The passage to the flute renders this itinerary especially legible. Bach’s writing appears here as harmony in act, conceived dance, virtual polyphony, formal energy transcending the sounding body for which it was born. Precisely here lies the deepest legitimacy of every successful transcription. It reveals the capacity of these pages to preserve identity and necessity through different timbres. In their new guise, the Suites continue to speak with unmistakable accent. Intact remains their great lesson, uniting discipline and imagination, constructive rigour and poetic breath. Intact remains, above all, that Bachian truth by which a single line, when conceived with absolute fullness, contains a world.
Giuliano Marco Mattioli © 2026

Artist(s)

Andrea Mogavero: Begins studying flute in 1992 after listening to the well-known French virtuoso Jean-Pierre RAMPAL, who becomes his principle guide and source of inspiration.
He cleverly graduates at the “Tito Schipa” Conservatory in Lecce, Italy and then he specializes with the international soloists Andrea GRIMINELLI and Claudi ARIMANY.
He collaborated with the great flutist Sir James GALWAY, with Massimiliano DAMERINI, Andrea GRIMINELLI, Claudi ARIMANY, Lady Jeanne GALWAY; with the canadian singer-songwriter Patrick WATSON, Vittoria YEO and the Luciano PAVAROTTI FOUNDATION.
In 2009 he has been invited to study at the “Ecole Normale de Musique A. Cortot” in Paris, from the Maestro Shigenori KUDO.
He has studied with important flutists as Jànos BALINT, Pierre-Yves ARTAUD and achieves the Degree in Musical Teaching Methodology at the “Nino Rota” School of Music in Monopoli, Italy; he got the Degree in Flute Soloist at the “G. Paisiello” Musical Institute in Taranto, Italy - studying with the flute teacher Angelo Malerba - and the Degree in Chamber Music. He attends “High Specializing Master for Wind Instrument Musicians in Soloist and Orchestras’ Repertoire” with Hans-Jörg SCHELLEMBERGER (1st Oboe at the Berliner Philharmonisches Orchester 1977-2001), Claudio Paradiso, Lorenzo Castriota Skanderbeg and Karl MARTIN.
He studied opera singing with Vanna Massari CAMASSA – Tito SCHIPA’s pupil.

Composer(s)

Johann Sebastian Bach: (b Eisenach, 21 March 1685, d Leipzig; 28 July 1750). Composer and organist. The most important member of the family, his genius combined outstanding performing musicianship with supreme creative powers in which forceful and original inventiveness, technical mastery and intellectual control are perfectly balanced. While it was in the former capacity, as a keyboard virtuoso, that in his lifetime he acquired an almost legendary fame, it is the latter virtues and accomplishments, as a composer, that by the end of the 18th century earned him a unique historical position. His musical language was distinctive and extraordinarily varied, drawing together and surmounting the techniques, the styles and the general achievements of his own and earlier generations and leading on to new perspectives which later ages have received and understood in a great variety of ways.
The first authentic posthumous account of his life, with a summary catalogue of his works, was put together by his son Carl Philipp Emanuel and his pupil J.F. Agricola soon after his death and certainly before March 1751 (published as Nekrolog, 1754). J.N. Forkel planned a detailed Bach biography in the early 1770s and carefully collected first-hand information on Bach, chiefly from his two eldest sons; the book appeared in 1802, by when the Bach Revival had begun and various projected collected editions of Bach’s works were underway; it continues to serve, together with the 1754 obituary and the other 18th-century documents, as the foundation of Bach biography.

13.75

Latest Da Vinci Releases