OSTINATO! Alla bastarda, Chaconnes, Passacaglias, and Other Ground-Bass Works

Physical Release: 27 June 2025

Digital Release: 11 July 2025

Additional information

Artist(s)

Composer(s)

, , , , , , ,

EAN Code

Edition

Format

Genre

Instrumentation

Period

Publication year

Description

The album’s program revolves around two interwoven musical practices that blossomed in early modern Europe: the basso ostinato and the viola bastarda. These concepts, nurtured across Italian, French, German, and Spanish traditions, illuminate how Renaissance and Baroque musicians balanced fixed structures with improvisatory freedom. A basso ostinato (Italian for “obstinate bass”) is a recurring bass line or harmonic pattern that obstinately repeats, providing a foundation over which variation and invention unfold. This device has roots deep in European music history – medieval examples can be found – but it flourished spectacularly in the 16th and 17th centuries as composers and performers from Naples to Paris embraced its potential. Instrumentalists of the late Renaissance delighted in spinning melodic variations above unchanging bass patterns, treating these repeating harmonies as a canvas for virtuosity and fancy. In Italy, such ground-bass dances as the passamezzo and romanesca became well-known frameworks for improvisation, their names traveling on manuscripts and tongues across the continent. Spain contributed its own exuberant patterns – for instance, the wild Folía (of Iberian origin) – and Spanish vihuela and guitar players cultivated the art of diferencias (variations) over ostinato basses. By the early Baroque, France had adopted the ostinato principle in the form of the chaconne and passacaille, which in the court of Louis XIV often served as grand dance finales in operas and ballets. The German lands, too, absorbed these influences: from ground-bass hymns in Lutheran settings to magnificent ostinato-driven works by Buxtehude and Pachelbel, culminating in J.S. Bach’s towering passacaglia and famous Ciaccona, which brought the genre to new heights of complexity and expressive depth. Across these regions, the basso ostinato fostered a distinctly harmonic mode of thinking – a cyclical underpinning that invited ever-new melodies and variations while the bass stubbornly repeated, thus marrying compositional structure with the spirit of improvisation.
Parallel to the bass-driven impulse of the ostinato, the viola bastarda tradition exemplifies the era’s inventive fusion of composition, transcription, and virtuosity. The term viola bastarda refers both to a type of bass viol and to a daring style of playing that was celebrated as a crowning achievement of musical Mannerism. Originating in late 16th-century Italy, this practice allowed a single bowed instrument to embody the essence of a complex polyphonic work. To play alla bastarda meant to take a choral madrigal or motet and transform it into a single, sweeping melodic line that traversed the full range of the viol, from its deepest tones to its highest register. The viola bastarda player became a one-person ensemble, deftly weaving together the original multiple voices by means of agile leaps, rapid diminutions, and elaborate ornamentation. This was virtuoso improvisation in the noblest sense: although written examples exist, contemporary accounts suggest that much of the bastarda style was extemporized, relying on the player’s ingenuity and deep harmonic understanding rather than any fully notated score. Such performances demanded a keen grasp of the underlying harmonic architecture of the piece, since the soloist had to imply or outline the chords and counterpoint while freely embellishing the melody. In effect, the viola bastarda art was a form of creative transcription – reimagining vocal polyphony for a solo instrument – and a display of idiomatic prowess, pushing the viol (and by extension, its cousin the cello) to expressive limits previously reserved for the human voice.
Taken together, the basso ostinato and viola bastarda represent a fascinating duality in European music history: one, a compositional ground that anchors flights of invention, and the other, a performative tour de force that liberates a single instrument to encompass an entire polyphonic texture. Both grew from the fertile interplay of improvisation and structure that characterized the late Renaissance’s shift into Baroque sensibilities. Both also transcended local origins to become pan-European phenomena: Italian musicians might improvise over a ruggiero ground that a German or English composer could also adopt, just as the Italian bastarda style inspired awe beyond Italy’s borders. In the program that follows, which spans Italian, French, Spanish, and German works, these historical practices are more than abstract concepts; they inform the very fabric of the music’s style and interpretation. This introductory essay thus offers a context for the listener, highlighting how obstinate basses and a bastard viol’s liberty of invention each contributed to a new musical aesthetic. It was an aesthetic in which repetition became a source of creativity, and meticulous craftsmanship went hand in hand with improvisational daring – a perfect backdrop for a solo cello journey into the heart of Baroque imagination.
DV

This recording was conceived in homage to the obstinate bass lines that haunt so much seventeenth-century music and still kindle the imagination of modern performers. Between the Renaissance and the early Baroque the cello’s ancestors-bass violin, violone, gamba-were rarely granted solo status. Yet the practice of suonare alla bastarda-leaping nimbly through every register of a polyphonic piece and compressing its strands into a single, virtuoso line-offered string players both a licence to embellish and a model for transcription. Adapting multi-voice works “to a means of performance other than that for which they were originally conceived” (to recall the classic definition of transcription) gradually encouraged a new, harmonically self-sufficient view of bowed bass instruments.
The present programme continues that tradition.Each piece shares an ostinato foundation, whether a ground bass (basso ostinato) or, in François Couperin’s Les Barricades Mystérieuses, a stubbornly reiterated chordal pattern whose unchanging rhythmic value anticipates the Prelude in G from Bach’s cello suites. Like the lexical root of ostinato-“a person who persists with stubborn tenacity despite contrary evidence”-the performer approaches the cello not merely as a melodic voice but as a harmonic universe compressed into four strings. The inclusion of the Southern Italian folk song Montanara di Carpino, itself spun over a repeating bass, highlights the deep affinity between learned and oral traditions and testifies to a repertoire that transcends geographic and social boundaries.
I came to love, study, and elaborate this music through the generous guidance of Lucia Tamburino, Enrico Onofri, Paolo Beschi, and Giancarlo Rado. Some transcriptions derive from original sources in two upper voices plus bass, others from a single melodic line with continuo, and still others from purely instrumental prints. All are offered here in the bastarda spirit: one instrument, many voices, unbroken imagination.
By embracing both the obstinate and the inventive, this album situates the cello in its dual role as singer and continuo, reviving a centuries-old freedom to roam across registers, traditions, and borders while remaining forever tethered to the ground.

Andrea Falconieri
Ciaccona; Passacaglia
A Neapolitan lutenist who later served as maestro di cappella to the Spanish viceroy in Naples, Falconieri absorbed both Italian and Iberian idioms. Dance rhythms, flexible phrasing, and instrumental virtuosity mark his Il primo libro di Canzone, Sinfonie, Fantasie, Capricci, Brandi, Correnti, Gagliarde, Alemane, Volte per Violini e Viole ouero altro Stromento a uno, due e tre con il Basso Continuo (1650), from which these two ostinato-based pieces are drawn.

Diego Ortiz
Ricercata prima; Ricercata seconda
Composer – theorist to the Spanish viceroys in Naples, Ortiz published Trattado de glosas (1553), the first manual of ornamentation for bowed strings. His ricercate, originally didactic, invite extempore diminutions that translate naturally into a bastarda-style cello idiom.

Marco Uccellini
Aria sopra la Bergamasca
As capo degl’instrumentisti at the Este court in Modena, Uccellini championed the emerging sonata. His infectious Bergamasca alternates lively dance strains over an unrelenting ground, epitomising the sectional, contrast-rich construction of mid-seventeenth-century instrumental music.

Tarquinio Merula
Ciaccona
A native of Busseto who flourished chiefly in Cremona yet gravitated stylistically toward the Venetian school, Merula applied the newest expressive devices-including bold chromaticism and intense rhythmic drive-to both sacred and secular genres. His Ciaccona, the piece No. 20 published in Canzoni overo sonate concertate per chiesa e camera, Op. 12 (1637) exemplifies that progressive credo.

Anonymous Italian
Una ciaccona; An Italian Ground
These anonymous grounds survive in Neapolitan manuscript miscellanies. Though their provenance remains obscure, their inventive variations and cantabile lines suggest close kinship with the cultivated repertoire performed in aristocratic salons.

Esaias Reusner
Passacaglia
Silesian lutenist Reusner served Duke Georg III of Brieg and later the Prussian court. Delitiæ testudinis (1667) and Neue Lauten-Früchte (1676) contain some of the era’s most elaborate solo-lute passacaglie; the present transcription preserves their ornamental filigree while exploiting the cello’s resonance.

François Couperin
Les barricades mystérieuses
Published in Pièces de clavecin (Book II, 1717), this enigmatic rondeau relies on a ceaseless sequence of suspensions whose metric ostinato anticipates later cello preludes. Transcribed here, its veiled harmonies reveal unexpected depth when sustained by gut strings and low register.

Johann Heinrich Schmelzer
Ciaccona
Court violinist to Emperor Leopold I, Schmelzer advanced violin technique and helped codify the Austrian sonata. His Ciaccona, originally composed in A major juxtaposes rustic dance gestures with courtly elegance, its expansive variation cycle ideal for bastarda exploration.

Heinrich Ignaz Franz Biber
Passacaglia
The closing piece of Biber’s Mystery Sonatas (c. 1676), this monumental passacaglia was among the earliest virtuoso works for solo violin. Its pregnant four-note bass, here transferred to the cello, underpins a spiritual meditation that rises from earthly tread to transcendent lyricism.

Michel Richard Delalande
Chaconne
Attributed to Delalande, principal chapel composer to Louis XIV and renowned for his grands motets and the Symphonies pour les soupers du Roy, this Chaconne embodies the splendour of Versailles through the refined structure of a ground bass enriched by ornate writing.
The score was directly handed to the performer without further contextual details, and at present it is not possible to determine with certainty to which of Delalande’s known works it may correspond.

Nicola Matteis
Diverse bizzarrie sopra la Ciaccona
The Neapolitan violin virtuoso who astonished Restoration London (“he seemed to be inspired and played such ravishing things on a ground,” wrote John Evelyn) published four books of Ayres. These “bizarre” variations transform the conventional ciaccona into a dazzling sequence of rhetorical flourishes.

Traditional
Montanara di Carpino
Collected by Diego Carpitella, Alan Lomax, and Roberto Leydi, this Gargano-area love song circulates in myriad versions yet invariably clings to its insistent basso ostinato. Its appearance here affirms the porous boundary between cultivated artifice and living folk practice-between notation and memory.
Enrico Sorbello

Artist(s)

Enrico Sorbello
Born in Catania, Enrico Sorbello first encountered music through the sound-programming software Aegis Sonix on an Amiga 500 computer. A teenage passion for the electric bass led him to record with the extreme-rock groups DeadSchizo and Sinoath, while parallel collaborations with Giancarlo Patelmo and Marco Timpanaro introduced him to blues and jazz idioms.
Sorbello later turned decisively to the cello, graduating with distinction from the Conservatorio di Santa Cecilia (Rome, 2003) and completing advanced studies in Baroque cello with Enrico Onofri and Dario Lo Cicero (Diploma, 2008). He holds a Master’s degree in Cello Pedagogy from the Conservatorio della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano (2010), where he worked under Taisuke Yamashita and Mattia Zappa, and subsequently refined his historical-performance practice with Paolo Beschi.
Active across genres, Sorbello joined the Sicilian Whistling Dixie Band (1999) and appeared the same year at the Rumori Mediterranei Festival in Roccella Jonica. He has performed J. S. Bach’s solo suites in the multidisciplinary production Isole nel sottosuolo (Catania, 2001) and participated in Hans Werner Henze’s opera Pollicino at Teatro Vascello, Rome. He is a founding member of La Follia early-music ensemble (2002) and collaborates regularly with the Palermo collective Curva Minore on free improvisation projects.
Invited by Hermann Nitsch, Sorbello took part in the “Theatre of Orgies and Mysteries” at Prinzendorf Castle (Austria), broadening his experimental credentials. Subsequent highlights include concerts with I Violoncelli di Santa Lucia for the illustrator Francesco Tullio Altan (Susegana Castle, 2017) and the solo recital programme OSTINATO!, presented in 2023 at Centro Zo (Catania) and the Botanical Garden of Palermo.
In 2024 he founded Galatea Irreale, a festival in Acireale devoted to cross-disciplinary explorations of Mediterranean soundscapes. Sorbello’s eclectic trajectory-spanning electronic beginnings, historically informed performance, and contemporary improvisation-nourishes a distinctive cello voice that unites rigorous scholarship with a spirit of unbounded curiosity.

Composer(s)

Italian composer and lutenist. He may have had lessons with Santino Garsi at Parma, where, according to Pico, he was brought up from an early age by the duke. He was employed as a lutenist at Parma from 1604 and replaced Garsi as official court lutenist by December 1610. After banking his salary for November 1614, he absconded, possibly to Mantua: in a letter of 12 December 1615 from Florence, where he appears to have been a temporary musician at court, he told the Duke of Mantua that he was sending him some of his compositions and recommended that they be sung by ‘Signora Margherita and her sister’, which suggests that he was already familiar with the musical resources there; he also said he was preparing to publish some of his pieces. His first known publication, a book of villanellas, appeared in 1616, and by 1619 he had also published six books of monodies and one of motets. The dedication of the villanellas to Cardinal de’ Medici suggests that he had indeed been employed at Florence, and this may have led to an appointment in Rome. About 1620–21 he appears to have married and moved to Modena as a player of the chitarrone and chitarriglia alla spagnola. Shortly before 24 July 1621 he departed for Spain, leaving behind his wife, one song and some copies of his (lost) book on the Spanish guitar, ‘a work already dedicated in print to the King of Hungary (now emperor)’. He was later ordered to proceed to France and seems to have travelled there and in Spain for some years. In October 1628, however, he took part with Loreto Vittori in the festivities at Florence for the wedding of Princess Margherita de’ Medici and Odoardo Farnese, Duke of Parma, and on 20 April 1629 he returned to Parma as a chitarrone player. Pico said he moved to Modena and Genoa after the death of Duke Ranuccio in 1635, but he was a music teacher at the convent of S Brigida, Genoa, from 1632 until at least 1637; in June 1636 he was denounced by the mother superior for distracting the nuns with his music. He was appointed lutenist in the royal chapel at Naples in 1639. In 1642 he obtained leave to visit his wife in Modena and appears also to have visited Genoa. Following the death of Trabaci in 1647, he was appointed maestro di cappella at Naples and held the post until his death of the plague.

Falconieri appears to have been most prolific as a songwriter but only three of his six or more books of secular vocal music are known to survive. These display a gift for melody and an interest in various musical forms. They are, for instance, among the earliest to reveal a distinction in the same song between recitative or arioso and aria; the best example of this is Deh dolc’anima mia (1619, ed. in Adler and Clercx), but a similar tendency can be found in Spiega la vela nocchiero (1616). His book of villanellas (1616) also includes an aria for soprano and bass, ‘sopra la ciacona’, a favoured duet combination for Falconieri.

His instrumental music survives in two large collections, one printed, the other manuscript. In the former there is little apparent difference between the works labelled ‘canzona’, ‘sinfonia’, ‘fantasia’ or ‘capriccio’: they all comprise two to four sections, all repeated, of which the last is often in triple time; some have descriptive titles, for example ‘L’eroica’, ‘La ennamorada’ and ‘La murroya’. There is also a ‘passacalle’ (32 variations on the descending minor tetrachord) and a ‘folia’ setting (16 variations on the well-known eight-bar bass). The pieces are in a fresh, spirited style with much imitation between melody and bass lines. The manuscript collection was probably copied in Florence or Rome between 1620 and 1640 for Gioseppe Antonio Doni. The attribution to Falconieri is most likely reliable, given his reputation as a lutenist and chitarrone player.

Diego Ortiz: (b Toledo, c1510; d ?Naples, c1570). Spanish theorist and composer. He was at Naples by 10 December 1553, when he dedicated his Trattado de glosas to the Spanish nobleman Pedro de Urríes, Baron of Riesi (Sicily). This work appeared simultaneously in Spanish and in an Italian version full of hispanicisms suggesting that Ortiz served as his own translator. If so, he must already have spent an extended period in the part of Italy under Spanish rule.

By February 1558 Ortiz was maestro de capilla of the viceregal chapel maintained at Naples by Fernando Alvarez de Toledo, 3rd Duke of Alba and Spanish Viceroy from 1556 to 1558. In 1565 he was still maestro de capilla to the conservative Pedro Afán de Rivera, Duke of Alcalá, Alvarez de Toledo’s successor as Spanish Viceroy (1559–71) to whom he dedicated his Musices liber primus. A book of masses promised in the preface to this work never appeared.

The Trattado de glosas, or ‘treatise on the ornamentation of cadences and other types of passage in the music of viols’, is the first printed ornamentation manual for the player of bowed string instruments. It teaches neither how to improvise nor how to add ornamentation at sight, but provides numerous written-out ornaments fitting exactly prescribed time limits. The player is told in book 1 to inspect the dozen or more ornamented variants provided after each simple cadence or passage, to choose the most apt and to write it into his part at the appropriate place. The accidentals shown in the simple cadence are to be retained in whatever ornamented variant the player selects. The second book begins with four solo recercadas (studies) for bass viol, followed by six recercadas on the bass La spagna in which agile tenor-clef counterpoints for violón are accompanied by keyboard harmonizations of the theme. Next come four recercadas (ornamented versions) of Arcadelt’s four-voice madrigal O felici occhi miei for viol and keyboard, followed by four of Pierre Sandrin’s four-part chanson Douce mémoire. Book 2 concludes with eight recercadas for bass viol and keyboard over passamezzo basses. Neither book quotes any distinctively Iberian air. Ortiz’s preoccupation with bowed rather than plucked instruments contrasted with contemporary Spanish preference. The sole 16th-century peninsular manuscript that cites his ornamentation formulae is a Portuguese keyboard source (P-C Mus.242), not a Spanish viol source.

The hymns, psalms, Salves and alternatim Magnificat settings of Ortiz’s Musices liber primus, for four to seven voices, are without exception based on plainsong. Although one setting of Pange lingua gloriosi quotes a Spanish chant, few other native traits are evident in the collection. His use of accidentals (the same note may be unaltered in one verse and sharpened in the next) agrees with Infantas’s treatment of plainsong cantus firmi in Plura modulationum genera (1579). In his dedication Ortiz encouraged the Spanish predilection for accompanying sacred polyphony with instruments. In his preface he referred to Ockeghem, Josquin Des Prez and Mouton as the ‘true doctors of music’, a view in accord with the conservative style of his compositions, which show the distinctive influence of Morales.

A five-part funeral motet, Pereat dies (ed. H. Eslava in Lira sacro-hispana, Madrid, 1869), is not in the book of 1565 and may be by another Ortiz, like the three long six-part motets of I-Rvat C.S.24, copied in 1545. Vicente Lusitano, the probable author of an anonymous treatise (ed. in Collet), mentioned a Missa ‘L’homme armé’ by ‘Ortiz’. Two intabulations in Valderrábano’s Silva de sirenas(1547) are ascribed in that collection not to Diego but to Miguel Ortiz.

Esaias Reusner: (b Löwenberg, Silesia [now Lwówek Šląski, Poland], 29 April 1636; d Cölln, Berlin, 1 May 1679). German composer and lutenist, son of Esaias Reusner. He was taught the lute by his father and became a child prodigy. About 1645, after the death of his mother, the family moved to Breslau, where at about the age of 12 he entered the service of the Swedish general Count Wittenberg as a page. He spent the next year in the household of the royal war commissioner, Müller. In 1651 he was employed in Poland as a valet at the court of Princess Radziwiłł, where he became a pupil of an unidentified French lutenist. He returned to Breslau in 1654 and in the following year became lutenist to Georg III, Duke of Silesia, an appointment he retained until 1672. He then moved to Leipzig, where he taught the lute for a year at the university. From 5 February 1674 until his death he was a chamber musician at the court of the Elector Friedrich Wilhelm of Brandenburg in Berlin. His two collections of suites for the lute, Delitiae testudinis and Neue Lauten-früchte, are important as showing the first application of French lute style by a German composer and also as early documents in the development of the instrumental suite. They contain a total of 28 suites, varying in number of movements from four to nine. Each suite is unified by a major or minor tonality. They all include the basic structure of later dance suites, allemande–courante–sarabande–gigue. Most of the longer suites begin with another dance, such as a paduana or ballo, or the characteristically French improvisatory prelude, and many conclude with a dance other than the gigue. Reusner’s influence was widely felt in Germany in the 17th century, and the style of his music established a precedent evident in the works of subsequent lutenists such as Silvius Weiss.

François Couperin (ii) [le grand]
(b Paris, 10 Nov 1668; d Paris,11 Sept 1733). Composer, harpsichordist and organist, son of (3) Charles Couperin (ii). He is the most important member of the Couperin dynasty. He wrote some of the finest music of the French classical school, and may be reckoned the most important musical figure in France between Lully and Rameau.

Heinrich Ignaz Franz Biber (bapt. 12 August 1644, Stráž pod Ralskem – 3 May 1704, Salzburg)[1] was a Bohemian-Austrian composer and violinist. Biber worked in Graz and Kroměříž before he illegally left his employer, Prince-Bishop Karl Liechtenstein-Kastelkorn, and settled in Salzburg.[1] He remained there for the rest of his life, publishing much of his music but apparently seldom, if ever, giving concert tours.

Johann Heinrich Schmelzer [Schmeltzer, Schmelzer von Ehrenruef]
(b Scheibbs, Lower Austria, c1620–23; d Prague, between 29 Feb and 20 March 1680). Austrian composer and violinist. He was the leading Austrian composer of instrumental music before Biber and made an influential contribution to the development of the sonata and suite.

Marco Uccellini (b c1603; d Forlimpopoli, nr Forlì, 11 Sept 1680). Italian composer and instrumentalist. After studying in Assisi he settled in Modena some time before 1639. In 1641 he became head of instrumental music at the Este court and in 1647 maestro di cappella at the cathedral there, a post he held until 1665. From 1665 until his death he was maestro di cappella at the Farnese court at Parma. None of the music of the operas and ballets he produced there has survived.

Uccellini is important as a composer of instrumental music, of which his extant output comprises seven printed collections; at least one other (op.1) is lost. Opp.2–5 are mainly devoted to sonatas, while the later prints contain shorter sinfonias and dances. Although the sonatas are early, they, together with his development of violin technique, represent his most notable achievements. Most of the sonatas are basically in ternary form; others are in as many as five sections. Variation and sequential repetition of themes and phrases are favourite methods of expanding sections; in an attempt to achieve thematic unity more than one subsequent section of several sonatas opens with a variant of the initial idea or even of an entire previous section. Uccellini’s use of triadic themes and lengthy sequences modulating through the circle of 5ths points towards a strong connection with the style later to be developed in Bologna by Cazzati, G.B. Vitali and G.M. Bononcini. His exploration of more distant keys such as B major, B minor and E minor, unusual in string music of the time, is notable. He also used piquant chromaticisms and false relations. The range of the violin is extended up to 6th position (g'''), and slurs, tremolo passages and wide leaps are frequent. The solo violin sonatas of opp.4 and 5 represent the highest point of development in the genre before J.H. Schmelzer and Biber. They are longer and in a patently more virtuoso style than those of Biagio Marini, and are clear counterparts to keyboard toccatas. The sinfonias, except for a battle piece in op.8, are less adventurous than the sonatas. The arie of the 1642 and 1645 collections are descendants of the older variation sonata; their thematic material includes an interesting selection of popular tunes of the time.

Tarquinio Merula (b Cremona, 1594–5; d Cremona, 10 Dec 1665). Italian composer, organist and violinist. He was one of the finest and most progressive Italian composers of his generation, and excelled in both vocal and instrumental music.
The suggested years for Merula's birth derive from the fact that he was confirmed on 23 April 1607, probably at the customary age of 12. His earliest post was probably as organist of S Bartolomeo, the church of the Carmelite Fathers, at Cremona. On 22 October 1616 he signed a three-year contract to serve as organist of the church of the Incoronata, Lodi. He was re-engaged on 8 February 1620 but appears to have left Lodi at the end of January 1621. He probably went directly to his next known position, in Poland, since in a letter of Anton Neunhaber of about that time he is mentioned as being in Warsaw. In 1624 the nature of his position is made explicit: he was serving as ‘organista di chiesa e di camera’ to Sigismund III, King of Poland.

Returning to Cremona, Merula was elected on 18 February 1626 provisional maestro di cappella for the Laudi della Madonna, which took place at the main altar in the cathedral on Saturdays and on vigils of Marian feasts. A regular appointment followed on 13 January 1627. In 1628 he was also holding the position of organist of the collegiate church of S Agata. His next move was to Bergamo, where on 12 April 1631 he signed a three-year contract to serve as maestro di cappella of S Maria Maggiore. As successor to Alessandro Grandi (i), who had died in the plague of 1630, Merula began the work of rebuilding the cappella. In his first year G.B. Buonamente was one of its members. Merula was, however, dismissed on 29 December 1632 for ‘indecency manifested towards several of his pupils’. Threatening a lawsuit to recover his lost salary, he was in turn faced with the prospect of a criminal complaint lodged by the governing body of S Maria Maggiore. On 11 April 1633 the matter was resolved by a statement from him in which he apologized and relinquished all claim to his salary. He again returned to Cremona and at his own request and by prior agreement was reinstated on 19 August 1633 as maestro di cappella for the Laudi della Madonna in the cathedral, thereby displacing G.B. Minzio, maestro at the time. Disagreements with the governing body there over matters of salary and responsibilities, however, led to his resignation in 1635. He is next heard of in 1638 at Bergamo, this time as maestro di cappella and organist at the cathedral, adjacent to S Maria Maggiore. Further problems with his former employers at S Maria Maggiore prompted them on 14 April 1642 to forbid any of their musicians to perform under his direction, thus disrupting the customary exchange of musicians between the two churches. He appears to have remained at Bergamo Cathedral until his final return to Cremona, which resulted from his appointment on 25 August 1646, in succession to Nicolò Corradini, as organist of the cathedral and as organist and maestro di cappella for the Laudi della Madonna. He thus held the last of these posts for the third time, and he now held all three until his death. In 1643 he collaborated with five others in composing music for La finta savia, performed in Venice. He was a member of the Accademia dei Filomusi of Bologna and a Knight of the Golden Spur.

13.76

Latest Da Vinci Releases