Additional information
| Artist(s) | |
|---|---|
| Composer(s) | |
| EAN Code | |
| Edition | |
| Format | |
| Genre | |
| Instrumentation | |
| Period | |
| Publication year |
Physical Release: 29 May 2026
Digital Release: 5 June 2025
| Artist(s) | |
|---|---|
| Composer(s) | |
| EAN Code | |
| Edition | |
| Format | |
| Genre | |
| Instrumentation | |
| Period | |
| Publication year |
Within Galuppi’s instrumental output, the music for harpsichord occupies a place of primary importance, to the point that, in terms of both quantity and quality, it may stand as representative of the entire corpus. Consulting Franco Rossi’s thematic catalogue, one can count 172 sonatas, often consisting of several movements. A quick calculation yields a total of approximately 400 movements. These purely quantitative data, to which qualitative considerations must be added, given the considerable musical significance of many of Galuppi’s sonatas, place the Buranello, in a hypothetical ranking of Italian eighteenth-century harpsichordists, in second place after Domenico Scarlatti. These compositions are highly heterogeneous, both formally and stylistically, having accompanied the composer throughout his life. Moreover, Galuppi’s numerous journeys in Italy and across Europe enabled him to play instruments with differing tonal and organological characteristics, leaving traces of this experience within the sonata corpus. All this raises a number of questions for performers, the principal one being the choice of instrument. From Burney we learn that Galuppi had a clavichord at home, a fact confirmed by the inventory of his possessions drawn up after his death. His sonatas, when not expressly intended for the organ, allow for performance on various harpsichord models, chosen according to the music, but also, if desired, on the clavichord and on the early fortepianos of Cristofori or Silbermann.
The sonatas presented in this volume have diverse origins and stand out for their great structural, formal, and stylistic variety. The sonatas R.A.1.11.12, R.A.1.11.14, R.A.1.11.15, R.A.1.08.12, R.A.1.16.01 are presented here in their first performance. As regards structure, namely the number of movements and their succession, all the sonatas included are strongly representative of Galuppi’s writing: there are sonatas in one, two, and three movements.
The Sonata in F major R.A.1.08.02, which opens the recording, consists of three movements in a slow-fast-fast sequence. The first movement is a clear homage by Galuppi to the Prélude non mesuré, widely used by French harpsichordists, and frequently adopted also by Handel. It may be hypothesised, with a good degree of plausibility, that the latter was Galuppi’s model, and that the entire sonata, unmistakably youthful in style, was composed by the Buranello during his London sojourn between 1741 and 1743. If this were true, one might ask why it did not, like others, find its way into Walsh’s publications; it is possible, however, that the writing adopted by the composer was deemed by the publisher too virtuosic for an edition aimed primarily at amateurs.
The Sonata in B-flat major R.A.1.16.04, by contrast, consists of two movements in a slow-fast sequence, and can boast no fewer than twelve manuscript sources. The first movement, an Andantino of marked cantabilità, represents a later phase of Galuppi’s writing, incorporating elements derived from dramma giocoso. This is even more evident in the ensuing Presto. In this brilliant piece, particular attention should be drawn to the cadential ‘snatched’ chords in the two sections, on the dominant and the tonic, in which the first and third beats of the bar feature groups of four semiquavers alternating between the hands, while the second beat is occupied by a rest. This allows the composer to obtain a particularly comic and original effect, well suited to the sound of the Italian harpsichord.
The Sonata in G major R.A.1.11.14, a single movement of broad cantabilità, seems to anticipate the writing of certain harpsichord pages by Joseph Haydn. One may compare, in this regard, the slow movements (both in the key of G, albeit minor) of the sonatas Hob. XVI no. 2 and Hob. XVI no. 6, datable to the early 1760s. It is well known that Haydn esteemed Galuppi (as well as Hasse), especially for his theatrical output, which undoubtedly served as a model for younger composers. It is therefore unsurprising to find certain affinities between the two also in music for keyboard.
The Sonata in G major R.A.1.11.15, like the previous one, survives in a single source preserved in Berlin. It consists of a single movement, Allegro assai, whose brilliant writing immediately calls to mind the opening movement of an opera overture.
The Sonata in C major R.A.1.01.15, on the other hand, consists of three movements in a slow-fast-fast tempo scheme. This sonata, also preserved in Berlin, differs markedly from the preceding ones, owing to the relative brevity of its individual movements and to its more mannered style, which at certain points seems to anticipate Mozart’s Viennese sonatinas K439b.
The Sonata in G major R.A.1.11.03, in two movements, survives in two sources: one preserved in Brussels, and one, with the second movement mutilated, in Venice. The first movement, a Larghetto in 3/4, offers one of the finest melodies invented by Galuppi for a keyboard instrument and, uniquely within his entire output, each section is divided in two, with the second half presenting the diminutions written out by the composer. This brings to mind Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach’s Sonaten mit Veränderten Reprisen H.136-140, published in Berlin in 1760. It is difficult to say whether there is any relationship between the sonatas of the two composers, since, given the current state of research, there is no evidence on which to establish a credible dating for Galuppi’s sonata. It is known that the two met in 1765, during Galuppi’s journey to St Petersburg, but it is possible that this choice, in any case marginal in Galuppi, was an independent initiative on the part of both composers. The second movement, an Andante in 2/4, is stylistically close to the Sonata in C major just discussed.
The Sonata in G major R.A.1.11.12, a single-movement Allegro, survives in a single source held at the Conservatorio San Pietro a Majella in Naples. It is noteworthy for its particular writing and for certain textual affinities between music by the Buranello himself and by Joseph Haydn. Beginning with Haydn, one may observe how the incipit of Galuppi’s sonata recalls the opening bars of the first movement of Haydn’s sonata (also in G major) Hob. XVI no. 27, datable to around the mid-1770s. There is a further element that allows us to propose a dating hypothesis for this sonata. A close analysis reveals that the melodic fragments over dominant and tonic pedals at the end of the two sections recall the corresponding passages (as well as the incipit, albeit with different harmonisation) of Argene’s aria ‘Fiamma ignota’ from Galuppi’s L’Olimpiade, first performed on 26 December 1747 at the Teatro Regio Ducale in Milan. It is therefore plausible to date this sonata to around that time.
The Sonata in F major R.A.1.08.12 is a charming minuet preserved in Berlin. The recording closes with the Sonata in B-flat major R.A.1.16.01. This sonata, in three movements of ample proportions, in a fast-slow-fast sequence, is preserved in two sources at the Sächsische Landesbibliothek in Dresden and at the British Library in London. It is notable for the brilliant and elegant writing of all three movements, as well as for the exhaustive treatment of the keyboard, which suggests a date later than all the other sonatas presented here.
Alvise De Piero © 2026
Alvise De Piero
Born in Venice in 1974, after obtaining his classical secondary-school diploma at the ‘Marco Foscarini’ Liceo, he graduated with highest honours in Music-oriented Literature at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice in 2004, with a thesis on the harpsichord sonatas of Baldassare Galuppi, known as ‘il Buranello’. In the meantime, he studied composition (obtaining the intermediate diploma at the ‘Benedetto Marcello’ Conservatory in Venice), piano, organ, harpsichord, clavichord, and fortepiano, further specialising in early keyboard instruments under the guidance of Christopher Stembridge at the Diocesan School of Music ‘Santa Cecilia’ in Brescia. He subsequently attended the PhD programme in Musicology and Musical Heritage at the Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, completing his doctorate in 2009 with a thesis on Euler’s Tentamen Novae Theoriae Musicae, which he translated into Italian for the first time, providing an historical introduction. Formerly a member of the examination board for Music History at the Department of Music and Performing Arts (now the Department of Visual, Performing and Media Arts) of the University of Bologna, in his capacity as a subject specialist, he has collaborated with the Musical Association ‘Angelo Mariani’ of Ravenna, the Musical Association ‘Ermanno Wolf-Ferrari’ of Venice, and the Musical Association ‘Consonanze’ of Casalecchio di Reno.
He has taught courses on the history of the singer-songwriter tradition and on eighteenth-century music history at the Università Popolare di Mestre. In recent years he has devoted particular attention to the publication of Galuppi’s music for Edition HH, together with Fabrizio Ammetto, and to the performance of eighteenth-century harpsichord repertoire.
Baldassarre Galuppi: (b Burano, nr Venice, 18 Oct 1706; dVenice, 3 Jan 1785). Italian composer. He was a central figure in the development of the dramma giocoso and one of the most important mid-18th-century opera seria composers. Known widely as ‘Il Buranello’, from his birthplace, he was routinely listed in Venetian documents and early manuscripts as ‘Baldissera’.
Galuppi’s father, a barber, played the violin in small orchestras, which provided entr’acte music for theatres of spoken comedy, and was probably the boy’s first music teacher. In his 16th year Baldassare composed Gli amici rivali for Chioggia (also performed in Vicenza as La fede nell’incostanza, probably by the same troupe), but Caffi reported this as a fiasco, a ‘scandal’. The boy went for advice to Marcello, who severely scolded him for attempting something so grand on so little experience and swore him to three years’ hard labour, studying under Antonio Lotti (first organist at S Marco), refraining from operatic composition altogether and focussing instead on counterpoint and the organ. Evidence for all this is circumstantial, however; other evidence suggests that Galuppi’s studies with Lotti had begun earlier.
If the young composer made this promise, he did not keep it, for two years later he was playing the cembalo in opera houses and writing substitute arias for revivals and pasticcios. By the age of 20 he had established a reputation as a cembalist in Venice and Florence, and was soon engaged in the S Angelo (where Vivaldi reigned), the S Samuele and the S Giovanni Grisostomo theatres, performing and supplying arias. He collaborated with his friend and fellow Lotti pupil, Giovanni Battista Pescetti, writing alternate acts of Gl’odi delusi del sangue in 1728 (set earlier by Lotti) and Dorinda in 1729. This modest success led to further commissions, and by 1738 his operas were appearing outside Venice; at the same time his nickname, ‘Il Buranello’, is first encountered. Tobia il giovane, an oratorio written for Macerata in 1734, was perhaps his earliest attempt in the genre. Alessandro nell’Indie was given its première in Mantua at about the same time that Issipile graced the stage in Turin (December 1737); the composer was probably present only in Mantua. In 1738 he was in the service of the patrician Michele Bernardo in Venice. Galuppi’s music for the festival of S Maria Magdalena in July 1740 at the Ospedale dei Mendicanti led to a permanent appointment there on 4 August. His duties ranged from teaching and conducting to composing liturgical music and oratorios.
Before 1740 and 1741 Galuppi’s Venetian career remained diverse, but unexceptional. Neapolitan composers were favoured at Venice’s most important theatres, and of the native sons only Vivaldi enjoyed any particular favour. In 1740 and 1741, the year of Vivaldi’s death, two serious operas by Galuppi appeared: Oronte at the prestigious S Giovanni Grisostomo and Berenice at the S Angelo. Galuppi petitioned for nine months’ leave and accepted an invitation to travel to London. Permission from the Mendicanti was reluctantly granted, and Galuppi arrived in London in October 1741 and supervised 11 opera productions over the next year and a half, including four original works. Some reported his tenure as less than admirable – Walpole claimed that the ‘music displeases everybody’ and Handel, in a letter of 29 December 1741, ridiculed the one serious opera he heard – but in general Galuppi’s trip was successful and he was well received. His music was often reprinted for the English public, and two more Galuppi works appeared there soon after he had left. Back in Venice by May 1743, he took up his old professions of cembalist and arranger; not much had changed, and his contract with the Mendicanti was extended for three more years. The spread of comic opera from Naples and Rome had just found its way to Venice, however, and Galuppi began adapting these to northern taste, beginning in 1744 with three Roman works by Latilla and Rinaldo di Capua. His own comic opera in Carnival 1745, La forza d’amore, was not particularly successful.
Galuppi’s fame began to spread and his fees to climb (as attested by documents from Milan, Madrid, Padua and elsewhere). In 1747 (and probably again in 1748) Galuppi was in Milan for L’olimpiade; Vologeso received its première in Rome in 1748, and Venice was increasingly enthusiastic. Circumstantial evidence suggests that Galuppi continued to arrange comic operas throughout these years. In May 1748 he was elected vicemaestro of the cappella ducale of S Marco. His work for the basilica and the ospedali was to lead to an enormous collection of sacred works, but for the near future his focus was on opera. By August he was in Vienna, where Demetrio and Artaserse were enormously successful, despite Metastasio’s criticism that Galuppi’s music did not serve the text well; Demetrio, performed 19 times over a short period, broke all box-office records. Galuppi left Vienna before the Artaserse première and was in Milan for the first performances of Semiramide riconosciuta, the second carnival opera of 1749.
The year 1749 marks the beginning of Galuppi’s long-term collaboration with the librettist Carlo Goldoni. Over the next eight years a rapid sequence of drammi giocosi appeared, beginning with Arcadia in Brenta (14 May 1749) and extending through four more works before a year had passed. These operas surged over Europe with unprecedented ease, and by the middle of the next decade Galuppi was the most popular opera composer anywhere. His professional obligations forced his resignation from the Mendicanti in 1751. His opere serie continued to command high praise. He wrote his first setting of Demofoonte for Madrid in December 1749, to mark the engagement of Maria Antonietta Ferdinanda of Spain to Vittorio Amedeo, heir to the throne of Piedmont, and then supplied the wedding festival music itself, La vittoria di Imeneo, for Turin the following June (it was performed more than 20 times). A new Artaserse opened the Teatro Nuovo in Padua in 1751. By April 1762 Galuppi was unanimously appointed maestro di coro of S Marco, the most important musical position in Venice, and in July he was elected maestro di coro at the Ospedale degli Incurabili.
In the meantime Galuppi continued to travel, fulfilling commissions for various (mostly serious) operas. Early in 1764 the Venetian ambassador to Vienna conveyed the wishes of the Russian minister to acquire Galuppi’s services; the Russian court knew his work and had already staged seven of his operas. In June 1764 the Venetian senate granted the composer leave to go (with the stipulation that he continue to supply a Christmas mass and other Vespers compositions for the basilica), and, after securing the welfare of his family and resigning from the Incurabili, Galuppi travelled to St Petersburg, visiting C.P.E. Bach (in Berlin) and Casanova along the way and arriving on 22 September 1765. For Catherine the Great’s court he produced new works (Ifigenia in Tauride, possibly a comic work, now lost, and two cantatas), revived Didone abbandonata (in Carnival 1766, an enormous success) and Il re pastore, and arranged other operas, as well as providing religious and occasional music. His 15 a cappella works on Russian texts for the Orthodox liturgy proved to be a watershed. Their Italian, light contrapuntal style joined with native melodic idioms was continued by Traetta and Sarti and maintained by, among others, D.S. Bortnyans’ky, his pupil in Venice and possibly earlier in St Petersburg. Galuppi travelled with the court to Moscow, where comic works were performed (no comic operas were allowed on the St Petersburg stage before 1779). He returned to Venice with many honours and gifts, took up his position at S Marco in late 1768 after visiting Hasse in Vienna, and was reappointed at the Incurabili. In summer 1769 Il re pastore was presented in Venice to honour the future monarch, Joseph II.
After this, Galuppi dedicated himself mainly to sacred music, although his operas continued to be performed. Burney reports that the composer was busy all year, playing the organ for Venetian churches and presiding over S Marco. La serva per amore, performed in October 1773, was his last operatic work. In May 1782 he conducted performances to honour the pope in Venice (including the sacred cantata Il ritorno di Tobia, with 60 musicians from the four Venetian conservatories) and received a visit from the future Tsar Paul of Russia. By 1784 his health declined, but he continued to compose, completing the Christmas mass for S Marco a few weeks before his death on 3 January 1785, after a two-month illness. He was buried in the church of S Vitale (exact location unknown), and a month later was honoured by a lavish requiem mass in S Stefano led by Bertoni, his deputy in S Marco. His wealth was not as extensive as once thought, but his will left inheritances to three sons and the bulk of a sizable estate to his wife, whom he names with tender praise. Seven other children (all daughters) are not mentioned.
Burney offered the most extensive account of Galuppi’s personality and appearance from a visit in 1770: ‘His character and conversation are natural, intelligent, and agreeable. He is in figure little and thin but has very much the look of a gentleman’. Galuppi’s lifelong dedication to his large family was well known, as Burney reported: ‘He has the appearance of a regular family man, and is esteemed at Venice as much for his private character as for his public talents’. To Burney he was witty and charming, referring to his study as the room ‘where he dirtied paper’. Burney named him the most inspired of all Venetian composers, superior to Piccinni and Sacchini and second only to Jommelli, and said that late in life Galuppi had lost none of the fire of his former years. Hasse, writing to Metastasio, referred to him as a ‘most excellent composer’ and in a poem Goldoni praised him with the epigram ‘What music! What style! What masterworks!’.
Galuppi’s son Antonio (d c1780) wrote the librettos for two of his father’s most successful operas, L’amante di tutte (1760) and Li tre amanti ridicoli (1761), and was probably involved also in arranging other comic works for S Moisè. His poetry and sense of comedy were in the tradition of Goldoni, though less inspired and articulate, more inclined to slapstick, buffoonery and caricature.
13.75€
Physical Release: 29 May 2026 Digital Release: 5 June 2025
Physical Release: 29 May 2026 Digital Release: 12 June 2025
Physical Release: 29 May 2026 Digital Release: 12 June 2025