DA VINCI PUBLISHING

INDEPENDENT RECORD LABEL & MUSIC PUBLISHER

Da Vinci Classics

Cabezon, Ganassi, Ortiz: The Art of the Vihuela de Arco

Fernando Marín

C000371 CdVihuela de arco

Physical and Digital Release: 13 October 2017

Fernando Marín explores the vihuela de arco through music by Cabezón, Ganassi and Ortiz, bringing Renaissance instrumental writing into focus through the sound and articulation of an early bowed instrument.

13.67€

View track listingClose track listing

The Art of the Vihuela de Arco · Fernando Marín · 26 tracks

  1. 01Recerchar PrimoSylvestro Ganassi · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco1:23
  2. 02Recercada Segunda (Tratado de Glosas, 1553)Diego Ortiz · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco1:48
  3. 03Recercada Segunda sobre el Passamezzo ModernoDiego Ortiz · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco1:40
  4. 04Fabordón del Primer Tono: I. LlanoAntonio de Cabezón · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco0:52
  5. 05Fabordón del Primer Tono: II. Glosado del tipleAntonio de Cabezón · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco0:55
  6. 06Para Quien Crie Yo CabellosAntonio de Cabezón · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco1:36
  7. 07Recercada PrimeraDiego Ortiz · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco1:46
  8. 08Recercada Primera sobre el Passamezzo AntiguoDiego Ortiz · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco1:42
  9. 09Fabordón del Tercer Tono: I. LlanoAntonio de Cabezón · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco0:43
  10. 10Fabordón del Tercer Tono: II. Glosado del tipleAntonio de Cabezón · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco0:57
  11. 11Eia Ergo (Buxheimer Orgelbuch, 1460/70)Anonymous · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco2:58
  12. 12Recercada Cuarta sobre la FolíaDiego Ortiz · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco2:01
  13. 13Recerchar QuartoSylvestro Ganassi · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco2:20
  14. 14Fabordón del Quinto Tono: I. LlanoAntonio de Cabezón · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco0:47
  15. 15Fabordón del Quinto Tono: II. Glosado del tipleAntonio de Cabezón · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco0:47
  16. 16Recercada Tercera sobre el Passamezzo ModernoDiego Ortiz · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco2:58
  17. 17Mort m’a Privé par sa CruelleAntonio de Cabezón · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco3:09
  18. 18Recercada TerceraDiego Ortiz · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco1:54
  19. 19Fabordón del Sexto Tono: I. LlanoAntonio de Cabezón · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco0:55
  20. 20Fabordón del Sexto Tono: II. Glosado del tipleAntonio de Cabezón · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco0:59
  21. 21Recerchar SecondoSylvestro Ganassi · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco1:06
  22. 22Recercada CuartaDiego Ortiz · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco1:40
  23. 23Recercada Quinta sobre el Passamezzo AntiguoDiego Ortiz · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco2:05
  24. 24Fabordón del Séptimo Tono: I. LlanoAntonio de Cabezón · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco0:36
  25. 25Fabordón del Séptimo Tono: II. Glosado del tipleAntonio de Cabezón · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco0:49
  26. 26Recerchar TerzoSylvestro Ganassi · Fernando Marín, vihuela de arco1:22

Timings follow the Spotify and Apple Music digital edition; titles and composer attributions have been checked against the original booklet.

Streaming
ArtistsFernando MarínBiographies

Originally from Alicante, the reputable gambist and cellist Fernando Marín has specialized in bowed instruments of the Renaissance and Baroque periods, historical interpretation and chamber music. He earned his doctorate in musicology with a thesis on the Spanish vihuela de arco, its sound and gut strings. Through his research into the origins, performance practices and repertoire of these instruments, he has developed a distinctive bowing technique and approach to accompanying the voice and even contributed to the Art of making of historical gut strings. He studied at some of Europe’s most renowned music schools: the Conservatorio Superior de Oviedo, the International Academy of Music and Fine Arts in Prague, the Musikhochschule in Cologne, the Royal Conservatory of Brussels and the Autonomous University of Barcelona. Wieland Kuijken was one of his most influential teachers. President of the Cultural Foundation Anima Cordae, he founded the duo Cantar alla Viola with soprano Nadine Balbeisi. They have devoted more than 22 years to researching and performing Renaissance music, reviving the exquisite practice of singing with a bowed viol, from which the duo takes its name. Using different types of viols to accompany the voice, such as the vihuela de arco and the English lyra-viol, they have explored a wide range of lesser-known repertoire extending from the Trecento to the early Baroque. Cantar alla Viola performs on reconstructions of Renaissance instruments, techniques and historical materials, including gut strings. A refined and distinctive bowing technique sustains the harmony and brings the instrumental sound close to the human voice, blending seamlessly with it and creating ideal conditions for vocal accompaniment. Intensive research into this specialised repertoire has led the duo to record numerous critically acclaimed CDs of previously unrecorded works. Cantar alla Viola has performed in festivals and concert series in the United States, Belgium, Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom and the Czech Republic, taking part in the Viola da Gamba Society of America’s Conclave and performing live on WNYC in New York and the BBC in London. Fernando Marín has also recorded seven solo CDs: eVIOLution, on the evolution of the viola da gamba; sCORDAtura, on gut strings in different tunings; The Art of the Vihuela de Arco, on the instrument and its repertoire; Magia consoni et dissoni a viola da gamba sola; Cello’s inside; Jacob Kremberg Musicalische Gemüths-Ergötzung oder Arien (1689); and J. Ch. Ziegler’s Intabulatura de Viola di Gamba. Four of these recordings received support from the Department of Culture of the Government of Aragon. He is a founding member of the Muslyramus cultural association and has collaborated on several projects supported by the Ministry of Culture, all directed by Dr. Javier Martínez: Musas, Música y Museos (2012), Joven Música Antigua (2013) and the Escuela de Violeros de Zaragoza (2016, 2019).

He currently designs and builds his own historical instruments and produces and supervises his recordings. He regularly collaborates with Capilla de Ministrers and Carles Magraner in concerts and recordings. Fernando Marín has given numerous courses and masterclasses on historical performance and practice of the vihuela de arco in Spain, Germany, the Czech Republic and the United States. He has published articles in the musicology journals Nassarre and Quodlibet on musical rhetoric, gut strings, ornamentation and improvisation. In 2017, he received a Leonardo Grant for Researchers and Cultural Creators from the BBVA Foundation for his project on the recovery of Renaissance vihuelas de arco and their musical performance. In 2025, he received the Music Award at the tenth edition of Radio Elda’s Cadena SER Awards.

As president of the Anima Cordae Cultural Foundation, he curates research and projects to promote musical heritage, advocating the preservation of the spirit of early music, especially bowed instruments, and its benefits for culture and society. Since 2003, he has taught viola da gamba at the Conservatorio Profesional de Música de Zaragoza.

Official website ↗

ComposersAnonymous, Antonio de Cabezón, Diego Ortiz, Sylvestro di Ganassi dal FontegoBiographies

Anonymous identifies works whose composer has not been securely established. Such music survives in manuscripts, printed anthologies and oral traditions, sometimes with conflicting or incomplete attributions. The source or collection named in each recording’s programme provides the context for the work; it is not itself the name of a composer.

Antonio de Cabezon: (b Castrillo de Matajudíos, nr Burgos, c1510; d Madrid, 26 March 1566). Composer and organist. Blind from childhood, he was probably educated at Palencia Cathedral under the care of the organist García de Baeza. In 1526 he entered the service of Queen Isabella and on 12 February 1538 he was appointed músico de la cámara to Charles V. On Isabella’s death in 1539 he was entrusted with the musical education of Prince Felipe and his sisters. Between 1548 and 1551 he accompanied Felipe on his travels to Milan, Naples, Germany and the Netherlands, and between July 1554 and August 1555 to London on the occasion of Felipe’s marriage to Mary Tudor. Cabezón married Luisa Nuñez de Mocos of Avila and they had five children. In his will, dated 14 October 1564, Cabezón described himself as ‘músico de cámara del rey don Felipe nuestro señor’.

Cabezón is ranked among the foremost keyboard performers and composers of his time. His music is rooted in the instrumental tradition of Spain and was composed for keyboard, plucked string instruments and ensembles (curiosos minestriles, ‘skilful minstrels’) that probably included string as well as wind players. Some of Cabezón’s compositions appeared in Venegas de Henestrosa’s Libro de cifra nueva (Alcalá de Henares, 1557). However, the greater part of his works were printed posthumously by his son Hernando de Cabezón in Obras de música para tecla, arpa y vihuela (Madrid, 1578; ed. in MME, xxvii–xxix, 1966). Together, these two volumes transmit some 275 works (migajas, ‘scraps’ or ‘crumbs’) by Cabezón. (His collected works are edited by C. Jacobs, Brooklyn, NY, 1967–86.)

His compositions fall into four distinct groups and contribute to all the principal musical genres of the period. They include: (i) functional liturgical works including hymns, Kyrie verses, psalm settings, Magnificat settings and fabordones; (ii) free works (tientos); (iii) intabulations (canciones glosadas y motetes); and (iv) variations (discantes). In general the compositions display a variety of styles, influenced by variation techniques, by the glosa or diminution. In the hymns and Kyrie verses, the cantus firmus is the principal structural framework, sometimes abandoned in favour of imitative polyphony. The fabordones comprise variations, organized according to mode, following a homophonic exposition (llano). Cabezón’s tientos form a significant contribution to the development of instrumental music between 1535 and 1540. In these works, the improvisatory style characteristic of the free works written at the beginning of the century is no longer seen; Cabezón used his knowledge of imitative counterpoint and an unusual sense of formal organization to create masterpieces with strong internal coherence. The tientos are linked thematically to plainchant formulas, in keeping with the form’s liturgical function. The intabulations are ordered according to polyphonic density, progressing from works with four parts to works with six. They are based on sacred and secular models by composers such as Josquin and Lassus, and are exuberant witnesses to a practice recommended by theorists such as Bermudo, who demanded that all instrumentalists study Franco-Flemish musical models. Finally the variations, called discantes, diferencias or sometimes glosas, form a high point in the history of the genre. His models include popular Spanish songs, such as El canto llano del caballero, dance forms and melodic-harmonic frameworks (as in the melody Guárdame las vacas, paired with a romanesca bass pattern). A wide range of variation techniques are seen, including migrating cantus firmus themes altered beyond recognition, and profuse ornamentation. During his journeys with the royal chapel Cabezón must have influenced musicians throughout Europe, in particular in England where composers such as Tallis and Byrd took up the art of variation.
A vocal work by Cabezón, Invocación a la letanía, is transmitted in the Cancionero de la Casa de Medinaceli (E-Mmc 13230; ed. in MME, viii, 1949). It also appears, under the title letanías, in an inventory of music from Cuenca Cathedral in 1611 together with ‘una misa de Cabeçon’.

Diego Ortiz: (b Toledo, c1510; d ?Naples, c1570). Spanish theorist and composer. He was at Naples by 10 December 1553, when he dedicated his Trattado de glosas to the Spanish nobleman Pedro de Urríes, Baron of Riesi (Sicily). This work appeared simultaneously in Spanish and in an Italian version full of hispanicisms suggesting that Ortiz served as his own translator. If so, he must already have spent an extended period in the part of Italy under Spanish rule.

By February 1558 Ortiz was maestro de capilla of the viceregal chapel maintained at Naples by Fernando Alvarez de Toledo, 3rd Duke of Alba and Spanish Viceroy from 1556 to 1558. In 1565 he was still maestro de capilla to the conservative Pedro Afán de Rivera, Duke of Alcalá, Alvarez de Toledo’s successor as Spanish Viceroy (1559–71) to whom he dedicated his Musices liber primus. A book of masses promised in the preface to this work never appeared.

The Trattado de glosas, or ‘treatise on the ornamentation of cadences and other types of passage in the music of viols’, is the first printed ornamentation manual for the player of bowed string instruments. It teaches neither how to improvise nor how to add ornamentation at sight, but provides numerous written-out ornaments fitting exactly prescribed time limits. The player is told in book 1 to inspect the dozen or more ornamented variants provided after each simple cadence or passage, to choose the most apt and to write it into his part at the appropriate place. The accidentals shown in the simple cadence are to be retained in whatever ornamented variant the player selects. The second book begins with four solo recercadas (studies) for bass viol, followed by six recercadas on the bass La spagna in which agile tenor-clef counterpoints for violón are accompanied by keyboard harmonizations of the theme. Next come four recercadas (ornamented versions) of Arcadelt’s four-voice madrigal O felici occhi miei for viol and keyboard, followed by four of Pierre Sandrin’s four-part chanson Douce mémoire. Book 2 concludes with eight recercadas for bass viol and keyboard over passamezzo basses. Neither book quotes any distinctively Iberian air. Ortiz’s preoccupation with bowed rather than plucked instruments contrasted with contemporary Spanish preference. The sole 16th-century peninsular manuscript that cites his ornamentation formulae is a Portuguese keyboard source (P-C Mus.242), not a Spanish viol source.

The hymns, psalms, Salves and alternatim Magnificat settings of Ortiz’s Musices liber primus, for four to seven voices, are without exception based on plainsong. Although one setting of Pange lingua gloriosi quotes a Spanish chant, few other native traits are evident in the collection. His use of accidentals (the same note may be unaltered in one verse and sharpened in the next) agrees with Infantas’s treatment of plainsong cantus firmi in Plura modulationum genera (1579). In his dedication Ortiz encouraged the Spanish predilection for accompanying sacred polyphony with instruments. In his preface he referred to Ockeghem, Josquin Des Prez and Mouton as the ‘true doctors of music’, a view in accord with the conservative style of his compositions, which show the distinctive influence of Morales.

A five-part funeral motet, Pereat dies (ed. H. Eslava in Lira sacro-hispana, Madrid, 1869), is not in the book of 1565 and may be by another Ortiz, like the three long six-part motets of I-Rvat C.S.24, copied in 1545. Vicente Lusitano, the probable author of an anonymous treatise (ed. in Collet), mentioned a Missa ‘L’homme armé’ by ‘Ortiz’. Two intabulations in Valderrábano’s Silva de sirenas(1547) are ascribed in that collection not to Diego but to Miguel Ortiz.

Sylvestro di Ganassi dal Fontego: (b ?Venice, 1492; d mid-16th century). Italian instrumentalist and writer. He was the author of two treatises on instrumental performance. Ganassi joined the pifferi of the Venetian government in June 1517, when he was hired as ‘contralto’ to fill a vacancy. From the 1517 document it is clear that his nickname ‘dal Fontego’ was derived from his place of residence near (or at) the Venetian ‘Fontego’, the palace by the Rialto where German merchants lived and traded. He is also mentioned in a few other documents from the late 1540s, and he might be the ‘Silvestro del cornetto’ who rented a storeroom near the Rialto in 1566. In his capacity as ‘piffero del Doge’ he probably supplied ceremonial and court music for the Doges and instrumental music at the Basilica di S Marco.

Ganassi published two treatises, one on the recorder, Opera intitulata Fontegara (Venice, 1535), and one in two volumes on the viola da gamba, Regola rubertina (Venice, 1542) and Lettione seconda (Venice, 1543). Most 16th-century books on instruments are either quasi-encyclopedic surveys, like those by Sebastian Virdung (1511) and Martin Agricola (1528 and later), or else very simple sets of instructions for tuning, fingering and intabulating, like the lutebooks by Hans Gerle (1532 and later) and Adrian Le Roy (1574). Ganassi’s works differ from all others in their detail and subtlety. They offer a complete discussion of instrumental technique up to its most sophisticated aspects: how to produce a good sound, rules for articulation (including advanced problems in bowing, tonguing and fingering), how to improvise ornamentation and, most important, how technique must be subordinated to expressiveness. In short, Ganassi’s volumes should be regarded as the starting point for any serious study of 16th-century performing practice, for together they give the most extended and most complete statement on the subject and reveal the high level of achievement the instrumentalists of the time had reached. Unfortunately the volumes are not easy for the English-speaking musician to use since they are written in a difficult Italian and partly in Venetian dialect. The existing translations of Fontegara into German and English are not wholly satisfactory.

Fontegara purports to be an exposition of the principles of playing wind instruments, dealing with ways of controlling the breath, tongue and fingers. Much of the volume is taken up with a rather scholastic presentation in a series of tables of the sorts of passaggi which may be applied to a melodic line; this merely dramatizes the central position improvised ornamentation held in the education of young instrumentalists and in the professional activity of master players. Besides passaggi, Ganassi also explains trills by semitones, whole tones and 3rds; various sorts of articulation including several varieties of double tonguing; fingerings, among them some that extend the range of the recorder to more than two octaves; and breath control, for good intonation, dynamic contrast and expressive performance. Throughout his book Ganassi holds up the human voice as the model for instrumentalists to follow. The copy of Fontegara in D-W has an appendix in Ganassi’s own hand setting out some 175 varied diminutions on a melodic formula.

In the two volumes of Regola rubertina, Ganassi first describes the most elementary aspects of viol playing – how to hold the instrument, how to finger it and so on – and then proceeds to explain in a complicated way various sorts of bowings, fingerings and tunings, including several scordatura tunings and some for viols with only three or four strings. He discusses techniques for playing above the frets, how to transcribe vocal music into tablature, how to place frets on the instrument, how to tell good from bad strings, how to improvise unaccompanied ricercares and how to play polyphonically. The volumes are illustrated with a number of charts, tables and diagrams.

Album notes

The Art of the Vihuela de Arco By Fernando Marín The vihuela de arco (bowed vihuela) was one of the most widely used musical instruments in Europe during the 15th and 16th centuries and the predecessor of most modern European bowed instruments. At the end of the 15th century, Johannes Tinctoris attributed Spanish origins (“hispanorum”) to the viola de arco, distinguishing its specific type from other European viols of the period (De inventione et usu musicae, Naples, 1481–83, book IV). Initially, these instruments had fewer strings and served several functions;…

Read the complete album notesClose full notes

The Art of the Vihuela de Arco

By Fernando Marín

The vihuela de arco (bowed vihuela) was one of the most widely used musical instruments in Europe during the 15th and 16th centuries and the predecessor of most modern European bowed instruments. At the end of the 15th century, Johannes Tinctoris attributed Spanish origins (“hispanorum”) to the viola de arco, distinguishing its specific type from other European viols of the period (De inventione et usu musicae, Naples, 1481–83, book IV).

Initially, these instruments had fewer strings and served several functions; their origins go back to the Middle Ages. The Iberian Peninsula preserves some of the oldest and most varied models, including those with a flat bridge, a double bridge or a da braccio playing position. Prominent Renaissance figures placed the vihuela de arco among the most highly regarded instruments of their time.

Its organological characteristics, particularly its construction, give it a distinctive identity within the family of bowed instruments, deserving greater attention than it has received so far. The vihuela de arco can sometimes sound like a 15th-century organetto, at other times like a dulcian or cornamuse, and may even resemble an Eastern bowed instrument imitating the human voice. In every case, it was conceived in an era when vocal polyphony and the timbre of the human voice provided the ideal model, long before the independent development of instrumental music.

The importance of this instrument in Renaissance musical life is reflected in treatises by authors such as Baldassare Castiglione, Sylvestro Ganassi and Diego Ortiz, yet little written material survives to document its musical practice. These authors tell us that its repertoire drew on vocal polyphony and consisted of ingenious arrangements and instrumental inventions imitating the lute, as was also the case with the vihuela de mano, organ and harp. These same authors placed the vihuela de arco among the most esteemed instruments of their age. This recording presents the results of more than fifteen years of research into the instrument’s organology, the arrangement of its repertoire and its historical performance practice. It pays a deserved tribute to an instrument praised in its own time and almost forgotten today.

Sources for the Musical Practice of the Vihuela de Arco

The performance technique I have developed for the vihuela de arco, giving it its characteristic sound, is based on descriptions by Tinctoris, Ganassi and Ortiz of how such instruments can imitate or accompany the voice:

Johannes Tinctoris: In the city of Bruges, two “Flemish brothers”, Carolus and Johannes, performed a polyphonic piece on two bowed vihuelas. They divided the tenor melody and the harmonies between the two viols and imitated each other in turn with such skill that they brought great pleasure, joy and affection to the spirit, passionately inflaming the Flemish theorist’s heart.

Sylvestro Ganassi: According to the meaning of the text and whether the music is cheerful or sad, the player should use alternating forte and piano bow strokes, or a “moderate” approach in the latter case. To convey sad or “afflicted” music, the bow should move in a slurred manner; the bow and left hand may even be shaken, “making a movement and giving spirit” to the instrument as the music requires. Like an orator who, “with the boldness of exclamation, gestures and movements”, must seek to imitate laughter, weeping and all the “effects put into the music through the words”, the player should not use a slurred bow and movements associated with sad music when performing cheerful music. Instead, cheerful music should be played with bow strokes suited to its character.

Diego Ortiz: “… the grace and effects produced by the hand depend on the player, playing sweetly and bringing out the voices in one manner or another, mixing gentle ornaments and passages. The bowing hand does not strike but draws firmly, while the left hand shapes the harmony, especially when there are two or three semiminims in a beat, stressing only the first and allowing the others to pass without striking with the bowing hand…”

The instruments are fitted with natural gut strings and bourdons made by Joan Xandrich from lamb and ram intestines, cleaned, twisted, dried and polished by hand. The bourdon strings are made from the gut of older rams.

Recording and Instruments

Fernando Marín · tenor vihuelas de arco.

Instruments by Javier Martínez: a copy of an instrument from 1541, built in 2013 (tracks 1, 11, 13 and 26); and a copy of an instrument from 1550, built in 2005 (tracks 2–10, 12 and 14–25).

Recorded in April 2017 at the Santuari de la Mare de Déu de Loreto, Ulldemolins, Tarragona, Spain. Recording engineer: Chris De Villiers.

Project supported by a 2017 Leonardo Grant for Researchers and Cultural Creators, BBVA Foundation, and with the support of S.P.L.M.

Production, design and art direction: OMK – Da Vinci. ℗ & © OMK – Da Vinci Classics.

Reviews

Selected awards, reviews and interviews. Radio broadcasts and podcasts are listed separately below.

More selected reviews

Musica Dei Donum

Review · Johan van Veen · 2019

“their music does very well on the strung vihuela”

In the second part of Singing with a viol, Johan van Veen recommends this recording to listeners interested in Renaissance music, highlighting the bowed vihuela’s suitability for polyphony and regretting only the short playing time.

Read the review ↗ - Musica Dei Donum

MusicWeb International

Mention · Johan van Veen · 7 July 2024

A retrospective reference to The Art of the Vihuela de Arco and Marín’s research in a review of A Musical Tour, from Renaissance to Baroque (C00888).

Read the reference ↗ - MusicWeb International

Concerto

Review · Reinhard Kriechbaum · March 2018

Concerto's official annual index records a review of Fernando Marin's The Art of the Vihuela de Arco in issue 278. The full review and its critical verdict have not been consulted.

Read the review ↗ - Concerto

Recording details